Cited by 80Social Media in Health EducationEducational Technology in LearningInnovations in Medical Education

Use of social media in education among medical students in Saudi Arabia

Open access
Alsuraihi, Anas Khaleel, Almaqati, Ahmed Saeed, Abughanim, Sultan Adnan, Jastaniah, Nisreen Abdulrahman·2016·Korean Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

PURPOSE: Social media (SM), a virtual place where people can share, exchange, and communicate their ideas and knowledge, has become the new trend in communication and learning. This study aims to explore Saudi Arabian medical students' usage of SM and to discover the most common resources used in medical education. Furthermore, it aims to illustrate students' belief about the influence of SM on their learning. METHODS: This cross-sectional study administered validated questionnaires to medical students from different universities in Saudi Arabia, via emails, Twitter, Facebook, and short message service. A non-probability sampling technique was utilized and a sample size of 381 students was arrived at, using 95% confidence interval and 5% margin of error, since the total number of medical students in Saudi Arabia is approximately 36,000. The total respondents were 657 students from 23 different Saudi Arabian medical schools (females: 60.5%, n=397; males: 39.5%, n=260). RESULTS: The questionnaires of 21% of the students (n=139) were excluded from the analysis since they were incomplete. The most common website used by both genders was YouTube (42.3%, n=185); however, males preferred using Twitter and Wikis (p=0.001). With regard to utilizing SM for learning, 95.8% (n=419) of the students believed that it is beneficial. Females stated that SM helps them link basic and clinical science (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Medical schools need to improve the utilization of SM by their faculty and students by developing activities and encouraging the usage of SM in education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3946/kjme.2016.40

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2016, 87.70% (n=576) of medical students in Saudi Arabia indicated using social networks in their education, considered it beneficial for learning, and their tutors do not use it effectively.

    “en el 2016, el 87.70% (n = 576) de estudiantes de medicina en Arabia Saudita indicaron usar redes sociales en su educación, quienes a su vez la consideraron como beneficioso para su aprendizaje y que sus tutores no la usan efectivamente (Alsuraihi et al, 2016).”
  • Studies on healthcare students in the Arab and Middle Eastern region supported the need to develop clear guidelines delineating the safe and professional use of social media by future healthcare providers.

    “In the Arab and Middle Eastern region, studies on healthcare students also supported the need to develop clear guidelines delineating the safe and professional use of social media by future healthcare providers [32, 39–41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Moran M Seaman J Tinti-Kane H Teaching, learning, and sharing: how today’s higher education faculty use social media Boston, USA Pearson Learning Solutions 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alsuraihi, A. K., Almaqati, A. S., Abughanim, S. A., & Jastaniah, N. A.
Affiliations
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA)
Corresponding author
Alsuraihi, Anas Khaleel
Venue
Korean Journal of Medical Education
Published
2016-12-01
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
343-354
ISSN
  • 1225-8067 (ISSN-L)
  • 2005-727X
  • 2005-7288
OpenAlex
W2557370594
Cited by
79
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean journal of medical education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
social media, medical students, medical education, online learning resources, YouTube, Twitter, wikis, gender differences, Saudi Arabia
MeSH terms
Attitude, Cross-Sectional Studies, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saudi Arabia, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, Universities, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review