The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Inquiry Into the Use of Generative AI and Its Implications in Education: Boon or Bane
Abstract
The emergence of generative AI technologies has provoked considerable debate among educators regarding their role in education. This study is an investigation of the benefits, disadvantages, and potential strategies for integrating generative AI in educational settings by analyzing societal impacts based on a literature review. We have surveyed the influence of generative AI in education through sources from peer-reviewed journals. The main findings show that generative AI can enhance accessibility and customization in learning for individual learners' needs and pacing. But there are problems with algorithmic biases, discrimination, and data privacy issues, too. This study advocates for mitigating bias, data transparency, and promotion and evaluation of AI policy and research. Generative AI in education hinges on how it is responsibly integrated and observes ethical guidelines, by way of the constant assessment that will guarantee its potential in revolutionizing learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly being applied in scholarly research, education, and publishing.”
From Guidance on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for SPUR Authors, Reviewers, and Readers (2025) · cites this paper as Baek and Wilson 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988510 · Cited by 4,133
Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7 · Cited by 1,473
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
Thorp, H. H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7879 · Cited by 1,437
Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Hwang, G.-J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001 · Cited by 1,435
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 · Cited by 1,181
ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education
Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074 · Cited by 863
Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127 · Cited by 647
The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858 · Cited by 517
Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12080153 · Cited by 509
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- AI for K-12. (2020). The Artificial Intelligence (AI) for K-12 initiative (AI4K12) is jointly sponsored by AAAI and CSTA. https://ai4k12.org/
- 10.1177/01622439211030007 · DOI
- 10.1609/aimag.v26i4.1848 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10382046.2023.2194036 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-04086-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120323 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103247 · DOI
- 10.3390/su142013185 · DOI
- 10.3390/su142013185 · DOI
- 10.1108/K-04-2022-0548 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/laws11050073 · DOI
- Langran, E., Searson, M., & Trumble, J. (2024). Transforming teacher education in the age of generative AI. In M. Searson, E. Langran & J. Trumble (Eds.). Exploring new horizons: generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 2-13). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 11, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
- 10.1093/grurint/ikac054 · DOI
- Mishra, P., & Heath, M. K. (2024). The (Neil) Postman always rings twice: 5 questions on AI and education. In M. Searson, E. Langran & J. Trumble (Eds.). Exploring new horizons: generative artificial intelligence and teacher education (pp. 14-24). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 11, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/223928/
- 10.5642/jhummath.TGSX1558 · DOI
- 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab041 · DOI
- 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2243134 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24727 · DOI
- 10.3390/su151813595 · DOI
- 10.4018/979-8-3693-0831-8.ch010 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiol.230163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11023-022-09602-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Strowel, A. ChatGPT and Generative AI tools: Theft of intellectual labor? IIC 54, 491–494 (2023). https://doi-org.libproxy.lib.csusb.edu/10.1007/s40319-023-01321-y · DOI
- 10.35542/osf.io/4mec3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00146-021-01264-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40593-022-00314-1 · DOI
- Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Teacher Education – CITE Journal
- 10.14324/LRE.19.1.32 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-020-0183-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.31107.37923 · DOI
Cited by
Guidance on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for SPUR Authors, Reviewers, and Readers
Mabrouk, P. A. (2025) · Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research · doi:10.18833/spur/8/2/4
Metadata
- Authors
- Baek, E. O., & Wilson, R. V.
- Affiliations
- California State University, San Bernardino, USA
- Venue
- International Journal of Adult Education and Technology
- Publisher
- IGI Global Scientific Publishing
- Published
- 2024-07-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 2643-7996
- 2643-8003
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 16
- Language
- ng
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_US (vor)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_US (am)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_US (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
