Cited by 509Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review

Open access
Montenegro-Rueda, Marta, Fernández-Cerero, José, Fernández-Batanero, José María, López-Meneses, Eloy·2023·Computers

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present, based on a systematic review of the literature, an analysis of the impact of the application of the ChatGPT tool in education. The data were obtained by reviewing the results of studies published since the launch of this application (November 2022) in three leading scientific databases in the world of education (Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar). The sample consisted of 12 studies. Using a descriptive and quantitative methodology, the most significant data are presented. The results show that the implementation of ChatGPT in the educational environment has a positive impact on the teaching–learning process, however, the results also highlight the importance of teachers being trained to use the tool properly. Although ChatGPT can enhance the educational experience, its successful implementation requires teachers to be familiar with its operation. These findings provide a solid basis for future research and decision-making regarding the use of ChatGPT in the educational context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/computers12080153

Cites

24 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brazdil, P.; Jorge, A. Progress in Artificial Intelligence: Knowledge Extraction, Multi-Agent Systems, Logic Programming, and Constraint Solving; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Olite, F.M.D.; Suárez, I.D.R.M.; Ledo, M.J.V. Chat GPT: Origen, evolución, retos e impactos en la educación. Educ. Médica Super. 2023, 37, e3876.
  3. Ausat, A.; Massang, B.; Efendi, M.; Nofirman, N.; Riady, Y. Can Chat GPT Replace the Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A Fundamental Analysis. J. Educ. 2023, 5, 16100-16106. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Alonso-Arévalo, J.; Quinde-Cordero, M. ChatGPT: La creación automática de textos académicos con Inteligencia artificial y su impacto en la comunicación académica y educativa. Desiderata 2023, 6, 136-142.
  5. Gilson, A.; Safranek, C.W.; Huang, T.; Socrates, V.; Chi, L.; Taylor, R.A.; Chartash, D. How does CHATGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Med. Educ. 2023, 9, e45312.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Teaching and Educational Organization, University of Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
  • Department of Education and Social Psychology, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
Venue
Computers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-29
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
153
ISSN
2073-431X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385422591
Cited by
509
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 207 · 2023: 28 · 2020: 1
FWCI
20.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the R&D&I project (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models in education, teaching-learning process, teacher professional development, AI tools in education, educational technology implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review