Cited by 200Pain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Effective Pain Management and Improvements in Patients’ Outcomes and Satisfaction

Glowacki, Diane·2015·Critical Care Nurse

Abstract

Adequate pain management is a compelling and universal requirement in health care. Despite considerable advancements, the adverse physiological and psychological implications of unmanaged pain remain substantially unresolved. Ineffective pain management can lead to a marked decrease in desirable clinical and psychological outcomes and patients’ overall quality of life. Effective management of acute pain results in improved patient outcomes and increased patient satisfaction. Although research and advanced treatments in improved practice protocols have documented progressive improvements in management of acute and postoperative pain, little awareness of the effectiveness of best practices persists. Improved interventions can enhance patients’ attitudes to and perceptions of pain. What a patient believes and understands about pain is critical in influencing the patient’s reaction to the pain therapy provided. Use of interdisciplinary pain teams can lead to improvements in patients’ pain management, pain education, outcomes, and satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4037/ccn2015440

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glowacki, D.
Affiliations
Diane Glowacki is a clinical nurse specialist at Mercy Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. She has held nursing leadership roles in project management, program development, process changes in best practice, and evidence-based clinical nursing practice. She led the development of a designated New York State stroke center and has had roles in stroke coordination. She leads the pain management team and assists in developing strategies to improve patients’ experience and satisfaction.
Corresponding author
Glowacki, Diane
Venue
Critical Care Nurse
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
33-41
ISSN
  • 0279-5442 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-8250
OpenAlex
W2238780089
Cited by
200
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Nurse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
pain management, acute pain, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, patient outcomes, quality of life, pain education, best practice protocol
MeSH terms
Critical Care, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Patient Care Team, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nurse's Role, Pain Management, Critical Care Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review