Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of dermal dendritic cells obtained from normal human skin reveals phenotypic and functionally distinctive subsets.

Nestle, F O, Zheng, X G, Thompson, C B, Turka, L A, Nickoloff, B J·1993·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The relative contribution of dermal-derived immunocompetent cells to the overall immunologic response in skin has been hampered by the lack of appropriate isolation techniques. In this report, we provide a purification schema that reliably yields highly purified populations of dermal dendritic cells (DDC). These cells are motile, express high levels of class II MHC antigens that decorate their cytoplasmic dendritic processes, and lack numerous B cell, T cell, and natural killer cell antigens. Using a broad panel of 45 different antibodies, an extensive phenotypic analysis was completed, revealing distinctive profiles for subsets of DDC. Despite homogeneous light scatter profile and cytologic appearance, three subsets of DDC could be distinguished by phenotypic and functional criteria. All DDC, but not epidermal Langerhans cells, express factor XIIIa. By triple color cell staining the relative distribution of factor XIIIa positive DDC is as follows: subset 1, 65% to 70% of total DDC express neither CD1a nor CD14; subset 2, 15% to 20% of total DDC express CD1a but not CD14; and subset 3, 10% to 15% of total DDC express CD14 but not CD1a. The CD14-negative subset of DDC were shown to be as potent stimulators of allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions as Langerhans cells or blood-derived dendritic cells. However, DDC subsets differed in their ability to support autologous T cell proliferation in response to the mitogenic lectin PHA or bacterial-derived superantigen. In these assays, subsets 1 and 2 were significantly more potent as antigen-presenting cells compared with subset 3. Thus, normal skin contains at least three separate populations of DDC, which have distinctive phenotypic markers and immunologic capabilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.151.11.6535

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Nestle, F. O., Zheng, X. G., Thompson, C. B., Turka, L. A., & Nickoloff, B. J.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1993-12-01
Volume
151
Issue
11
Pages
6535-6545
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W4322095708
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of dermal dendritic cells obtained from normal human skin reveals phenotypic and functionally distinctive subsets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.151.11.6535
The paper
Nestle, F. O., Zheng, X. G., Thompson, C. B., Turka, L. A., & Nickoloff, B. J. (1993). Characterization of dermal dendritic cells obtained from normal human skin reveals phenotypic and functionally distinctive subsets. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.151.11.6535

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.