Synergistic Activation of the Germline ε Promoter Mediated by Stat6 and C/EBPβ
Open accessAbstract
Transcription of the Ig H chain germline transcripts is a prerequisite for class switching. Expression of the ε germline transcript is induced by IL-4 and requires the integrity of a composite IL-4 response element. The element is bound by the IL-4-inducible transcription factor Stat6 and one or more members of the CAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family, a constitutively expressed class of transcription factors. Here, we show that Stat6 and C/EBPβ cooperate to synergistically activate transcription from the ε element. The effect was most pronounced in lymphoid cells, and the activation domains of both proteins were required to achieve this synergy. Although other members of the C/EBP family are able to bind the element, very little cooperativity was seen with C/EBPα and none with C/EBPγ. In fact, C/EBPγ was able to inhibit IL-4-induced reporter activity. Stat6 and C/EBPβ bind the IL-4 response element simultaneously. The fast dissociation rate apparent when Stat6 binds this DNA element alone is slowed when C/EBPβ binds at the neighboring site. These data suggest a mechanism whereby C/EBPβ stabilizes Stat6 binding at this element, thereby increasing the likelihood that both of their activation domains will interact, possibly with other factors, to activate transcription in an IL-4-dependent manner.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although STATs bind a similar DNA binding site, they may interact with co-activators or co-repressors to regulate different sets of their own downstream targets.
“Although they bind to a similar DNA binding site, STATs may interact with co-activator or co-repressor to regulate different sets of their own downstream targets (5”
From STAT3 Contributes to the Mitogenic Response of Hepatocytes during Liver Regeneration (2002) · cites this paper as [43]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says STAT proteins can cooperate with other transcription factors and that the interactions probably depend on promoter context; it demonstrates Stat6–C/EBPβ synergy at one promoter. It does not establish that different STATs bind similar DNA sites or that co-repressors help them regulate distinct sets of downstream targets. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells.
Cao, Z., Umek, R. M., & McKnight, S. L. (1991) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.5.9.1538 · Cited by 1,663 · see citing works
Transcriptional activation by recruitment
Ptashne, M., & Gann, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/386569a0 · Cited by 1,158 · see citing works
Zhang, D.-E., Hetherington, C. J., Meyers, S., Rhoades, K. L., Larson, C. J., Chen, H.-M., Hiebert, S. W., & Tenen, D. G. (1996) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.16.3.1231 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Caldenhoven, E., van Dijk, T. B., Solari, R., Armstrong, J., Raaijmakers, J. A. M., Lammers, J.-W. J., Koenderman, L., & de Groot, R. P. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.22.13221 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
STAT3 Contributes to the Mitogenic Response of Hepatocytes during Liver Regeneration
Li, W., Liang, X., Kellendonk, C., Poli, V., & Taub, R. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m202807200 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Gray, M. J., Poljakovic, M., Kepka-Lenhart, D., & Morris, S. M. (2005) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.004 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Interleukin-4/STAT6 Represses STAT1 and NF-κB-dependent Transcription through Distinct Mechanisms
Ohmori, Y., & Hamilton, T. A. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m006227200 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Ikizawa, K., Kajiwara, K., Izuhara, K., & Yanagihara, Y. (2001) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.5723 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mikita, T., Kurama, M., & Schindler, U.
- Affiliations
- Surrozen, Inc. (United States) (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1822-1828
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W4313333868
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McKnight Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- STAT6, C/EBPβ, class switch recombination, transcriptional synergy, C/EBP family, C/EBPα, lymphoid cells, transactivation domain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review