Cited by 35Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionDigital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of a Positive Psychology-based self-help book

Open access
Parks, Acacia C, Szanto, Rebecca K·2013·Terapia psicológica

Abstract

The current article discusses the potential utility of self-help books as a means of disseminating positive psychological interventions, and presents data comparing a positive psychology-based self-help book with a cognitive-behavioral self-help book and a self-monitoring control condition.We studied college freshmen (N=58), and argue that this population is a particularly appropriate target for well-being intervention.Outcome measures included both indices of efficacy (depressive symptoms and life satisfaction) and effectiveness (e.g. the extent to which participants found their assigned activities to be meaningful).The two book groups outperformed the control and were equivalently efficacious at reducing depressive symptoms; on life satisfaction, positive self-help outperformed cognitive-behavioral, but only at 6-month follow-up.Positive self-help was also superior to cognitive-behavioral self-help on indices of effectiveness.Possibilities for future directions are discussed, with an emphasis on the realities of practical dissemination to both college students, and to the general public.Key words.self-help books

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0718-48082013000100013

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital tools have proven efficient for different psychological issues outside any pandemic situation.

    “The use of such digital tools has already been investigated for different psychological issues, outside any pandemic situation, and has proven efficient (e.g., [67,68]).”

    From At the Peak of the Second Wave of COVID-19, Did Millennials Show Different Emotional Responses from Older Adults? (2022) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Abstract (pp. 141–149) reports that two self-help book groups reduced depressive symptoms compared with a control group. The discussion mentions web- and smartphone-based programs as having potential, but does not establish that digital tools proved effective; it also says use of a web component was very low. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., & Paulus, M. P. (1997). The role of clinical significance of subsyndromal depressive symptoms (SSD) in unipolar major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 5-17.
  2. Parks, A. C. (2003). Developing a brief and cost-effective method of pre- venting depression and anxiety, promoting health and well-being, and fostering resilience in college freshmen. (Senior Thesis, Reed College).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parks, A. C., & Szanto, R. K.
Affiliations
Hiram College (US)
Venue
Terapia psicológica
Published
2013-04
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
141-149
ISSN
  • 0716-6184 (ISSN-L)
  • 0718-4808
OpenAlex
W2081706188
Cited by
35
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Terapia psicológica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, self-help books, intervention dissemination, university students, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, well-being interventions, efficacy and effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review