Cited by 105Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth Policy Implementation ScienceMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

An evaluation of positive psychology intervention effectiveness trials using the re-aim framework: A practice-friendly review

Hone, L.C., Jarden, A., Schofield, G.M.·2015·The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract

Meta-analyses indicate the efficacy of positive psychology interventions in promoting well-being. But, despite accumulating empirical and anecdotal evidence of these interventions’ implementation in real-world settings, no review of effectiveness research exists. Accordingly, we identified 40 positive psychology intervention effectiveness trials targeting adults, and scored their reporting using the practice-friendly RE-AIM tool which assesses five dimensions of intervention utility: Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. Reporting levels varied substantially: reporting on Reach scored 64%; Efficacy scored 73%; Adoption scored 84%; Implementation scored 58%; and Maintenance scored 16%. Within these five dimensions, reporting on participation rates, methods to select delivery agents, differences between participants and non-participants, programme maintenance and costs, was particularly sparse. The studies involved 10,664 participants, approximately half required specialist delivery, and 12 were researcher delivered. To maximize the potential of PPIs for population health promotion, expanded reporting on effectiveness trials is required. Recommendations to assist this process are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439760.2014.965267

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G. M.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hone, L.C.
Venue
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2014-10-13
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
303-322
ISSN
  • 1743-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9779
OpenAlex
W2022264740
Cited by
105
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Positive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
positive psychology interventions, intervention effectiveness, RE-AIM framework, reporting quality, intervention reach, intervention adoption, intervention implementation, intervention maintenance, intervention costs, well-being promotion, population health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review