Cited by 31Medicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsExercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The effect of eight weeks of supplementation with Eleutherococcus senticosus on endurance capacity and metabolism in human

Kuo, Jip·2010·The Chinese Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of Eleutherococcus senticosus (ES) supplementation on endurance capacity, cardiovascular functions and metabolism of recreationally trained males for 8 weeks. Nine recreationally trained males in college consumed 800 mg/d of ES or starch placebo (P) for 8 weeks according to a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled and crossover design with a washout period of 4 weeks between the cycling trials. Subjects cycled at 75% VO2 peak until exhaustion. The examined physiological variables included endurance time, maximal heart rate during exhaustion exercise, VO2, rating of perceived exertion and respiratory exchange ratio. The biochemical variables including the plasma free fatty acid (FFA) and glucose were measured at rest, 15 min, 30 min and exhaustion. The major finding of this study was the VO2 peak of the subjects elevated 12% (P < 0.05), endurance time improved 23% (P < 0.05) and the highest heart rate increased 4% (P < 0.05) significantly. The second finding was at 30 min of 75% VO2 peak cycling, the production of plasma FFA was increased and the glucose level was decreased both significantly (P < 0.05) over 8-week ES supplementation. This is the first well-conducted study that shows that 8-week ES supplementation enhances endurance capacity, elevates cardiovascular functions and alters the metabolism for sparing glycogen in recreationally trained males.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4077/cjp.2010.amk018

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intake of Eleutherococcus senticosus extract is not associated with serious side effects.

    “moreover, the intake of Eleuterococcus senticosus extract is not associated with serious side effects [46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].”

    From Plant Adaptogens—History and Future Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuo, J.
Affiliations
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Corresponding author
Kuo, Jip
Venue
The Chinese Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
105-111
ISSN
0304-4920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156804237
Cited by
31
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Chinese Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Eleutherococcus senticosus, endurance capacity, peak oxygen uptake, cardiovascular function, free fatty acids, plasma glucose, glycogen sparing, exercise metabolism, endurance exercise, herbal supplementation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blood Glucose, Double-Blind Method, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Metabolism, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Eleutherococcus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review