Cited by 79Medicinal Plants and Bioactive CompoundsExercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and Training

Effect of Eleutherococcus senticosus on submaximal and maximal exercise performance

DOWLING, ELIZABETH A., REDONDO, DIEGO R., BRANCH, J. DAVID, JONES, SHARON, McNABB, GREGORY, WILLIAMS, MELVIN H.·1996·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

We investigated the effect of Eleutherococcus senticosus Maxim L (ESML) on performance during submaximal and maximal aerobic exercise. Twenty highly trained distance runners randomly assigned in matched pairs to either an experimental (ESML) or placebo (PL) group, participated in an 8-wk double-blind study during which they completed five trails of a 10-min treadmill run at their 10 km (10K) race pace and a maximal treadmill test (T(max)). Following a baseline trail, ESML and PL consumed, respectively, 3.4 ml of ESML extract or placebo daily for 6 wk. Subjects were tested every 2 wk during supplementation and 2 wk following withdrawal. Heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (VO2), expired minute volume (VE), ventilatory equivalent for oxygen (VE/VO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during the 10K and T(max) tests. Resting, post-10K and post-T(max) blood samples were analyzed for serum lactate. No significant differences were observed between ESML and PL for: HR, VO2, VE, VE/VO2, RER, or RPE; T(max) time to exhaustion; or serum lactate. The data do not support an ergogenic effect of ESML supplementation on selected metabolic, performance, or psychologic parameters associated with submaximal and maximal aerobic exercise tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199604000-00013

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intake of Eleutherococcus senticosus extract is not associated with serious side effects.

    “moreover, the intake of Eleuterococcus senticosus extract is not associated with serious side effects [46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].”

    From Plant Adaptogens—History and Future Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DOWLING, E. A., REDONDO, D. R., BRANCH, J. D., JONES, S., McNABB, G., & WILLIAMS, M. H.
Affiliations
Old Dominion University (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1996-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
482-489
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003522862
Cited by
78
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
Eleutherococcus senticosus, Siberian ginseng, ergogenic aids, endurance performance, submaximal aerobic exercise, maximal aerobic exercise, long-distance runners, oxygen consumption, heart rate, respiratory exchange ratio, rating of perceived exertion, serum lactate, time to exhaustion, herbal supplementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Panax, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Plants, Medicinal, Respiration, Running, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review