Cited by 29Vector-borne infectious diseasesClimate Change and Health ImpactsViral Infections and Vectors

Mathematical modelling of the impact of climatic conditions in France on Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick activity and density since 1960

Open access
Beugnet, Frédéric, Kolasinski, Michel, Michelangeli, Paul-Antoine, Vienne, Julien, Loukos, Harilaos·2011·Geospatial health

Abstract

Rhipicephalus sanguineus, the brown dog tick, has a worldwide distribution in areas with a relatively warm climate, including mild winters. This tick plays an important role as vector for various animal and human pathogens, including bacteria and protozoa. Based on precise daily meteorological data from the past 40 years, combined with mathematical modelling designed to predict tick activity, two modelling approaches were developed. The first examined the evolution of the number of weeks with favourable biological conditions for ticks in four French cities located at various latitudes of the country: Nîmes in the south, Paris in the north, Lyon in the east and Nantes in the west. The second analysed the extension of the geographical surface area in km(2) where the biological conditions favour tick activity for at least 12 weeks per year. Both analyses revealed clear evidence of increased temperatures coupled with an augmented tick activity index in three of the four cities. However, the change was not significant in Nîmes, where the climate is Mediterranean and the tick is already endemic. For Paris, Lyon and Nantes, the activity index values have increased significantly, i.e. by 4.4%, 4.0% and 3.4%, respectively. The distribution of the activity index values is evolving strongly with significantly fewer values below 50% since the 1960s and a clear decrease of values between 20% and 50% during the latest decade. Between 1960 and 2000, the theoretical extension of the surface area where the climatic index is suitable for R. sanguineus has increased by 66%. Even though several other important factors, such as changes in biotopes or human activity, are not included in this study, the resulting patterns and trends are noticeable. Our models constitute the first demonstration of the impact of climate change on the activity and distribution of ticks and confirm the observed northward migration trend for this Mediterranean domestic tick.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4081/gh.2011.178

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rhipicephalus sanguineus, endemic in Mediterranean regions, can now survive and develop in Southwest France up to Nantes and in Southeast France up to Lyon.

    “The use of a meteorological model [13] and biological data regarding the brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, applied to Europe since 1960, clearly indicates that this tick species, endemic in Mediterranean regions, can now survive and develop in the Southwest of France up to Nantes and in the Southeast of France up to Lyon [14] (Fig. 2).”
  • The climatic zone favorable for reproduction of Rhipicephalus sanguineus has expanded by 669% since the 1960s in Europe.

    “Moreover, the climatic zone favorable for their reproduction has expanded by 669% since the 1960s in Europe [14].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beugnet, F., Kolasinski, M., Michelangeli, P.-A., Vienne, J., & Loukos, H.
Corresponding author
  • Beugnet, Frédéric
  • Kolasinski, Michel
  • Michelangeli, Paul-Antoine
  • Vienne, Julien
  • Loukos, Harilaos
Venue
Geospatial health
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
255
ISSN
  • 1827-1987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1970-7096
OpenAlex
W2148981634
Cited by
29
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Geospatial health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CNR Solar (Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository) (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
Keywords
Rhipicephalus sanguineus, tick activity, tick density, climate change, temperature, tick distribution, northward range shift, tick vectors, France, mathematical modeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Arachnid Vectors, Dog Diseases, Dogs, France, Humans, Models, Biological, Zoonoses, Tick-Borne Diseases, Ecosystem, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Animal Migration, Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review