Cited by 45Eating Disorders and BehaviorsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Knowledge of the female athlete triad and relative energy deficiency in sport among female cross-country athletes and support staff

Open access
Lodge, Melissa T., Ackerman, Kathryn E., Garay, Jessica·2022·Journal of Athletic Training

Abstract

Context: Female endurance athletes exhibit an increased risk of the female athlete triad (Triad) and relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S). The triad and RED-S are conditions that involve the health and performance consequences of low energy availability. Few authors of studies to date have assessed the knowledge that athletes, coaches, and athletic trainers (ATs) have regarding the Triad or RED-S. Proper education has been shown to be effective in increasing knowledge of sports medicine concerns for athletes, yet no known continuing education programs for the Triad or RED-S exist at collegiate institutions. Objective: To assess the knowledge, confidence, and educational impact of identifying, screening, treating, and preventing the Triad or RED-S. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: An evidence-based online survey was developed and administered via Qualtrics. Patients or Other Participants: Female collegiate cross-country athletes (n = 275, age = 20 ± 1 years), collegiate cross-country coaches (n = 55, age = 34 ± 9 years), and ATs working with cross-country teams (n = 30, age = 36 ± 11 years). Main Outcome Measure(s): Knowledge, confidence, and educational impact scores were assessed among groups using analysis of variance. Independent t tests were calculated to determine differences in impact scores between people who had or had not received education on the topic. Results: Female cross-country athletes' total knowledge, confidence, and educational impact scores (mean scores = 25.00 ± 5.27, 95.42 ± 28.83, and 18.81 ± 7.05, respectively) were different from those of coaches (mean scores = 26.92 ± 5.02, 111.35 ± 24.14, and 22.41 ± 6.33, respectively) and ATs (mean scores = 28.66 ± 4.02, 117.67 ± 22.53, and 23.93 ± 5.69, respectively; P < .05). Conclusions: Knowledge, confidence, and educational impact scores regarding Triad or RED-S were lowest in female cross-country athletes and highest in ATs. These findings support the call for education, which should be regarded as the primary tool for increasing knowledge, to improve the prevention and treatment of the Triad or RED-S.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4085/1062-6050-0175.21

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies reported similar knowledge gaps among physiotherapists and athletic trainers.

    “other studies reported similar knowledge gaps among physiotherapists and athletic trainers.142 145”

    From 2023 international olympic committee's (IOC) consensus statement on relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) (2023) · cites this paper as [145]

    The introduction (page unavailable) reports prior assessments finding gaps in athletic trainers’ knowledge of the female athlete triad, and the Discussion (page unavailable) describes a prior survey in which few trainers identified a key component correctly. The paper does not report a comparable finding about physiotherapists, so it supports only the athletic-trainer part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lodge, M. T., Ackerman, K. E., & Garay, J.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Athletic Training
Published
2021-07-30
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
385-392
ISSN
  • 1062-6050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-162X
OpenAlex
W3183967214
Cited by
45
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Athletic Training (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
female athlete triad, relative energy deficiency in sport, low energy availability, cross-country athletes, female endurance athletes, coaches, athletic trainers, sports medicine education, knowledge and confidence, screening and prevention, college athletics, continuing education, eating disorders, menstrual disorders, bone health, injury risk, gender differences in health knowledge, nutrition education
MeSH terms
Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sports, Female Athlete Triad Syndrome, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review