Cited by 32Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSports, Gender, and Society

Knowledge, attitude, and skill of high school coaches with regard to the female athlete Triad

Pantano, Kathleen J.·2017·Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Abstract

Study objective The purpose of this study was to investigate knowledge high school coaches have about the female athlete triad and to determine if gender differences in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors exist. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting Twenty-six high schools in and around the vicinity of Cleveland, Ohio. Participants Two-hundred currently employed high school coaches. Interventions Participants completed a 30-question survey used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors coaches had about the female athlete triad. Main outcome measures Descriptive statistics (means, SD, frequency) and gender differences in response to triad knowledge, attitude, and behavior questions. Results One hundred twenty-three high school coaches completed the survey. Survey respondents were between 25 and 35 years of age, coached for 6-10 years, and coached female athletes 75%-100% of the time. Twenty-four percent reported "having heard of the triad" and 14% (17 of 123) were able to correctly name all of its components. There were no significant differences between gender and the coach's ability to correctly name the 3 triad components (t = 1.47, P = .14). There was no correlation between coach gender (r = 0.13, P = .07), age (r = 0.07, P = .42), number of years of coaching (r = 0.014, P = .88), and coach's knowledge of the triad components, respectively. Conclusion Female athletes might be at risk for developing the female athlete triad and high school coaches can be instrumental…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.09.013

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pantano, K. J.
Affiliations
Cleveland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pantano, Kathleen J.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
540-545
ISSN
  • 0932-8610 (ISSN-L)
  • 1083-3188
OpenAlex
W2527886673
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
Keywords
female athlete triad, high school coaches, coach knowledge, coach attitudes, gender differences, female athletes, risk identification, prevention education
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Ohio, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Sex Factors, Female Athlete Triad Syndrome, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review