Cited by 100Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Quality of and patient satisfaction with primary health care for anxiety disorders

Open access
Stein, Murray B., Roy-Byrne, Peter P., Craske, Michelle G., Campbell-Sills, Laura, Lang, Ariel J., Golinelli, Daniella, Rose, Raphael D., Bystritsky, Alexander +2 more·2011·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most patients with anxiety disorders receive their care from primary care practitioners (PCPs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate quality of and patient satisfaction with primary health care for anxiety disorders. METHOD: A survey was performed among 1,004 outpatients with anxiety disorders (diagnosed according to DSM-IV) referred by their PCPs from 17 primary care clinical settings (3 of which were university-affiliated) in 4 regions of the United States for participation in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) study, a therapeutic trial. Participating research institutions were the University of Washington at Seattle, the University of California at San Diego and Los Angeles, and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences at Little Rock. Enrollment took place between June 2006 and April 2008. Patients were contacted by telephone after enrollment to provide information about previous care received (during the 6 months prior to referral) and satisfaction with that care. Quality-of-care indicators were self-reported type, dose, and duration of antianxiety medication treatment and self-reported psychotherapy with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) elements. RESULTS: A total of 576 patients (57.4%) had received an appropriate antianxiety medication in the previous 6 months, but only 289 patients (29.4% of 983 who answered this question) had received the medication at adequate dose for at least 2 months. A total of 465 patients (46.3%) had received some counseling with at least 1 element of CBT, but only 213 patients (21.2%) had received counseling with a strong (3+ elements) CBT focus. Overall, 416 patients (41.4%) had received quality pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy, and 81 patients (8.1%) had received both. Only 432 patients (44.8% of 964 who answered this question) were at least somewhat satisfied with their mental health care. Receipt of quality psychotherapy was the sole positive predictor (adjusted odds ratio = 2.71; 95% CI, 1.94-3.80; P < .0005) of satisfaction with mental health care for anxiety. Moreover, there was a dose-response relationship between the number of CBT elements consistently delivered and satisfaction with care (test for trend, z = 4.06, P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite recognition of these patients' anxiety disorders and referral by their PCPs to an anxiety treatment study, fewer than half of the patients had in the prior 6 months received quality pharmacologic and/or psychosocial mental health care. Receipt of CBT-oriented, quality psychosocial (but not pharmacologic) care showed a strong dose-response relationship with satisfaction with mental health care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.09m05626blu

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, M. B., Roy-Byrne, P. P., Craske, M. G., Campbell-Sills, L., Lang, A. J., Golinelli, D., Rose, R. D., Bystritsky, A., Sullivan, G., & Sherbourne, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Stein, Murray B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2011-02-22
Volume
72
Issue
07
Pages
970-976
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072669374
Cited by
100
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH057835, K24MH065324, K24MH064122, R01MH057835, K24MH64122, U01MH070022, U01MH070018, U01MH057858, U01MH058915)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
anxiety disorders, primary care, quality of care, patient satisfaction, anxiolytics, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychotherapy, medication dose, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Primary Health Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Patient Satisfaction, Evidence-Based Medicine, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review