Cited by 93Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessSleep and related disorders

National trends in antidepressant, benzodiazepine, and other sedative-hypnotic treatment of older adults in psychiatric and primary care

Open access
Maust, Donovan T., Blow, Frederic C., Wiechers, Ilse R., Kales, Helen C., Marcus, Steven C.·2017·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how use of antidepressants, benzodiazepines, and other anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotics among older adults (age ≥ 65 years) has changed over time among visits to primary care providers and psychiatrists. METHODS: Data were from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (years 2003-2005 and 2010-2012), a nationally representative cross-section of outpatient physician visits. Analysis focused on visits to primary care providers (n = 14,282) and psychiatrists (n = 1,095) at which an antidepressant, benzodiazepine, or other anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotic was prescribed, which were stratified by demographic and clinical characteristic (including ICD-9-CM diagnosis) and compared across study intervals. Odds of medication use were calculated for each stratum, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The visit rate by older adults to primary care providers where any of the medications were prescribed rose from 16.4% to 21.8% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.43, P < .001) while remaining steady among psychiatrists (75.4% vs 68.5%; AOR = 0.69, P = .11). Primary care visits rose for antidepressants (9.9% to 12.3%; AOR = 1.28, P = .01) and other anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotics (3.4% to 4.7%; AOR = 1.39, P = .01), but the largest growth was among benzodiazepines (5.6% to 8.7%; AOR = 1.62, P < .001). Among patients in primary care, increases primarily occurred among men, non-Hispanic white patients, and those with pain diagnoses as well as those with no mental health or pain diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: From 2003 to 2012, use of the most common psychotropic medications among older adults seen in primary care increased, with concentration among patients with no mental health or pain diagnosis. As the population of older adults grows and receives mental health treatment in primary care, it is critical to examine the appropriateness of psychotropic use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.16m10713

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While some studies have shown a decrease in the prescribing of some drug classes, such as benzodiazepines over time, these decreases have been small and inconsistent across different countries.

    “While some studies have shown a decrease in the prescribing of some drug classes, such as benzodiazepines over time [83, 84], these decreases have been small and inconsistent across different countries [85, 86].”

    From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Discussion reports that international findings on benzodiazepine prescribing were mixed, supporting the claim of inconsistency. It does not say that decreases were small; in this study of older US adults, benzodiazepine visits increased in primary care from 2003 to 2012. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]The Mental Health and Substance Use Workforce for Older Adults: In Whose Hands? 2012 The National Academies Press 24851291
  2. [43]Soldo B Mitchell O Tfaily R McCabe J Cross-Cohort Differences in Health on the Verge of Retirement 2006 Cambridge, MA National Bureau of Economic Research No. w12762

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maust, D. T., Blow, F. C., Wiechers, I. R., Kales, H. C., & Marcus, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Maust, Donovan T.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2017-04-26
Volume
78
Issue
04
Pages
e363-e371
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607739546
Cited by
93
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K08AG048321)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
antidepressants, benzodiazepines, older adults, primary care, psychiatrists, inappropriate medication use, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, medication appropriateness
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Benzodiazepines, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Primary Health Care, Psychiatry, United States, Health Care Surveys, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review