Cited by 17Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessPain Management and Opioid Use

Aumento da utilização de benzodiazepínicos entre idosos mais velhos: Projeto Bambuí

Open access
Oliveira, Aline Luiza Marcondes Lopes, Nascimento, Mariana Martins Gonzaga do, Castro-Costa, Érico, Firmo, Josélia Oliveira Araújo, Lima-Costa, Maria Fernanda, Loyola Filho, Antônio Ignácio de·2020·Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the most widely used psychoactive drugs, despite the risks associated with their prolonged use, especially among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of benzodiazepines among community-dwelling people aged ≥ 75 years. METHODS: The study was conducted among members of the baseline (in 1997) and survivors (in 2012) of the Bambuí Project cohort. The prevalence of benzodiazepine use was estimated separately for each year, and the comparison between them was performed using the Poisson regression model with robust variance. RESULTS: The prevalence of benzodiazepine use was higher in 2012 (33.9%) compared to 1997 (24.9%). After multiple adjustments, the difference in prevalence did not remain significant in study population (PR = 1.25; 95%CI 0.99 - 1.60), unlike that observed in the female stratum (PR = 1.38; 95%CI 1.04 - 1.84). Clonazepam was the strongest-growing drug between the two years (PR = 4.94; 95%CI 2.54 - 9.62). CONCLUSION: This study showed an important increase in benzodiazepine use in an older adult population. These results are concerning as these drugs are contraindicated for use in older adults, mainly if used chronically, and are available in the national list of essential medicines. Health professionals should be aware of the risks involved in its use regarding this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1980-549720200029

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While some studies have shown a decrease in the prescribing of some drug classes, such as benzodiazepines over time, these decreases have been small and inconsistent across different countries.

    “While some studies have shown a decrease in the prescribing of some drug classes, such as benzodiazepines over time [83, 84], these decreases have been small and inconsistent across different countries [85, 86].”

    From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) reports declining benzodiazepine use in several countries but increasing use in others, supporting the claim that trends differ across countries. It does not characterize the decreases as small; the reported decline in Canada, from 23.2% to 14.8%, makes that blanket description uncertain. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. REV BRAS EPIDEMIOL 2020; 23: E200029
  2. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67(4): 674-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15767 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveira, A. L. M. L., Nascimento, M. M. G. D., Castro-Costa, É., Firmo, J. O. A., Lima-Costa, M. F., & Loyola Filho, A. I. D.
Affiliations
  • Fiocruz Minas (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil
Venue
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
Published
2020
Volume
23
Pages
e200029-e200029
ISSN
  • 1415-790X (ISSN-L)
  • 1980-5497
OpenAlex
W3022437052
Cited by
17
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
benzodiazepines, older adults, prevalence trends, clonazepam, community-dwelling older adults, drug use in older adults, sex differences in drug use, essential medicines
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Benzodiazepines, Brazil, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Psychotropic Drugs, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review