The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Duloxetine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duloxetine hydrochloride, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, was evaluated for therapeutic efficacy and safety/tolerability in the treatment of major depression. METHOD: In an 8-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 173 patients (aged 18-65 years) with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were randomly allocated to receive placebo (N = 70), duloxetine (N = 70), or fluoxetine, 20 mg q.d. (N = 33). Duloxetine dose was titrated in the first 3 weeks in a forced-titration regimen from 40 mg (20 mg b.i.d.) to 120 mg/day (60 mg b.i.d.). Patients were required to have a Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-Severity of Illness scale score of at least moderate severity (> or = 4) and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score of at least 15. Patients could not have had any current primary DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis other than major depressive disorder, or any anxiety disorder as a primary diagnosis within the past year, excluding specific phobias. The primary efficacy measurement was the HAM-D-17 total score, and secondary measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, CGI-Severity of Illness and CGI-Improvement, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement. Safety was evaluated by recording the occurrence of discontinuation rates and treatment-emergent adverse events and by measurement of vital signs and laboratory analytes. RESULTS: Duloxetine was superior to placebo in change on the HAM-D-17 (p = .009). Estimated probabilities of response and remission were 64% and 56%, respectively, for duloxetine, compared with 52% and 30% for fluoxetine and 48% and 32% for placebo. Duloxetine was numerically superior to fluoxetine on the primary and most of the secondary outcome measures. In general, duloxetine was well tolerated; 76% of patients achieved the maximum dose, and insomnia and asthenia were the only adverse events reported statistically significantly (p < .05) more frequently by duloxetine-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that duloxetine is efficacious for the treatment of major depressive disorder and is well tolerated and safe.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Duloxetine is a well-tolerated, efficacious [28–30] SNRI antidepressant”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Geddes, J. R., Higgins, J. P., Churchill, R., Watanabe, N., Nakagawa, A., Omori, I. M., McGuire, H., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60046-5 · Cited by 1,654
PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Gelenberg, A. J., Freeman, P. B., Markowitz, J. C., Rosenbaum, J. F., Thase, M. E., Trivedi, M. H., & Rhoads, R. S. (2010) · Cited by 1,372
Duloxetine vs. placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy
GOLDSTEIN, D. J., Lu, Y., Detke, M. J., Lee, T. C., & Iyengar, S. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.03.029 · Cited by 861
Self-citationArnold, L. M., Lu, Y., Crofford, L. J., Wohlreich, M., Detke, M. J., Iyengar, S., & Goldstein, D. J. (2004) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.20485 · Cited by 624
Self-citationMillan, M. J. (2006) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.11.006 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, D. J., Mallinckrodt, C., Lu, Y., & Demitrack, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 225-231
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003363634
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- duloxetine, major depressive disorder, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine, antidepressant efficacy, drug safety and tolerability, treatment response and remission, insomnia, asthenia, adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thiophenes, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review