Cited by 471Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in the treatment of women with fibromyalgia with or without major depressive disorder

Arnold, Lesley M., Rosen, Amy, Pritchett, Yili Lu, D'Souza, Deborah N., Goldstein, David J., Iyengar, Smriti, Wernicke, Joachim F.·2005·Pain

Abstract

This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine, a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in 354 female patients with primary fibromyalgia, with or without current major depressive disorder. Patients (90% Caucasian; mean age, 49.6 years; 26% with current major depressive disorder) received duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) (N=118), duloxetine 60 mg twice daily (BID) (N=116), or placebo (N=120). The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory average pain severity score. Response to treatment was defined as >or=30% reduction in this score. Compared with placebo, both duloxetine-treated groups improved significantly more (P or=30% in this score (duloxetine 60 mg QD (55%; P<0.001); duloxetine 60 mg BID (54%; P=0.002); placebo (33%)). The treatment effect of duloxetine on pain reduction was independent of the effect on mood and the presence of major depressive disorder. Compared with patients on placebo, patients treated with duloxetine 60 mg QD or duloxetine 60 mg BID had significantly greater improvement in remaining Brief Pain Inventory pain severity and interference scores, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Clinical Global Impression of Severity, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and several quality-of-life measures. Both doses of duloxetine were safely administered and well tolerated. In conclusion, both duloxetine 60 mg QD and duloxetine 60 mg BID were effective and safe in t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.031

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnold, L. M., Rosen, A., Pritchett, Y. L., D'Souza, D. N., Goldstein, D. J., Iyengar, S., & Wernicke, J. F.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Venue
Pain
Published
2005-12
Volume
119
Issue
1-3
Pages
5-15
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990079987
Cited by
471
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 31
FWCI
21.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
duloxetine, fibromyalgia, major depressive disorder, women, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, pain intensity, pain interference, quality of life, dose comparison, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Thiophenes, United States, Comorbidity, Placebo Effect, Women's Health, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review