Cited by 144Smoking Behavior and CessationSchizophrenia research and treatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The association between high nicotine dependence and severe mental illness may be consistent across countries

de Leon, Jose, Becona, Elisardo, Gurpegui, Manuel, Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana, Diaz, Francisco J.·2002·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies all over the world suggest that severe mental illness, including schizophrenia and mood disorders, is associated with tobacco smoking. This study, combining samples from the United States and Spain, had 3 objectives: (1) to test the hypothesis that severely mentally ill patients who smoke are more likely to have a high nicotine dependence when compared with control smokers, (2) to compare frequencies of high nicotine dependence in controls in both countries, and (3) to compare frequencies of high nicotine dependence in severely mentally ill patients in both countries. METHOD: Scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) for 4 samples of current daily smokers were analyzed. The sample sizes of the U.S. and Spanish control groups were 129 and 646 subjects, respectively. The diagnoses for the U.S. patients were DSM-IV schizophrenia, 74% (89/120), and DSM-IV mood disorders, 26% (31/120). The diagnoses for the Spanish patients were DSM-IV schizophrenia, 87% (173/199), and DSM-III-R mood disorders, 13% (26/199). High nicotine dependence (FTND score > or = 6) was the dependent variable in 5 logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The main findings were that (1) severely mentally ill patients had significantly higher frequencies of high nicotine dependence than controls (odds ratio [OR] = 10.59, 95% CI = 7.31 to 15.34) even after controlling for gender, country, interaction between country and mental illness, and age; (2) U.S. controls had significantly higher frequencies of high nicotine dependence than Spanish controls (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 2.02 to 5.00); and (3) U.S. and Spanish patients did not have significantly different frequencies of high nicotine dependence. CONCLUSION: New studies, specially designed to test for transcultural differences in nicotine dependence, are needed to verify that nicotine dependence in severely mentally ill patients is consistently high and similar in different countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v63n0911

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Leon, J., Becona, E., Gurpegui, M., Gonzalez-Pinto, A., & Diaz, F. J.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2002-09-15
Volume
63
Issue
9
Pages
812-816
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974462417
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
nicotine dependence, severe mental illness, schizophrenia, mood disorders, smoking, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, cross-cultural comparison, United States, Spain
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Smoking, Spain, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review