Cited by 308Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatonin

A Review of the Evidence for the Efficacy and Safety of Trazodone in Insomnia

Mendelson, Wallace B.·2005·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Trazodone, a triazolopyridine antidepressant, is currently the second most commonly prescribed agent for the treatment of insomnia due to its sedating qualities. Given trazodone's widespread use, a careful review of the literature was conducted to assess its efficacy and side effects when given for treatment of insomnia. Data sources In April 2003, a MEDLINE search was conducted using the search terms trazodone and insomnia and trazodone and sleep and restricted to 1980-2003, human subjects, and English language. As trazodone has been implicated in cardiac disorders, a further search was conducted using the term cardiac and trazodone. Study selection All clinical trials that measured any endpoint for insomnia efficacy were included in the assessment. A total of 18 studies were identified from the literature search. In addition, commonly used texts were consulted for information regarding adverse effects related to trazodone. Data extraction Because so few studies were identified by the literature search, all were evaluated and described. Data synthesis Evidence for the efficacy of trazodone in treating insomnia is very limited; most studies are small, conducted in populations of depressed patients, raise issues of design, and often lack objective efficacy measures. Side effects associated with trazodone are not inconsequential, with a high incidence of discontinuation due to side effects, such as sedation, dizziness, and psychomotor impairment, which raise particula…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v66n0409

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence for efficacy of sedating low-dose antidepressants when used alone is relatively weak.

    “Evidence for their efficacy when used alone is relatively weak 38-42 and no specific agent within this group is recommended as preferable to the others in this group.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendelson, W. B.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Mendelson, Wallace B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2005-04-15
Volume
66
Issue
04
Pages
469-476
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963793408
Cited by
308
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
trazodone, insomnia, antidepressant efficacy, adverse effects, sedation, cardiac side effects, drug tolerance, elderly patients, risk-benefit assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Drug Tolerance, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Priapism, Sleep, Trazodone, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review