Cited by 21Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Acute Worsening of Chronic Depression During a Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Antidepressant Efficacy: Differences by Sex and Menopausal Status

Harvey, Anne T., Silkey, Beryl S., Kornstein, Susan G., Clary, Cathryn M.·2007·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Acute worsening of depression can negatively impact the outcomes of clinical trials of antidepressants and patient compliance to treatment. We hypothesized that acute worsenings would be more frequent in premenopausal women, relative to men or postmenopausal women, and in women who had demonstrated premenstrual symptom exacerbations (PMEs) prior to treatment, relative to those who had demonstrated no PMEs. METHOD: Subjects diagnosed with DSM-III-R chronic major depressive disorder or double depression (dysthymia with concurrent major depressive episode) were randomly assigned between February 1993 and December 1994 to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with flexibly-dosed sertraline or imipramine, with crossover to the alternate drug in the absence of response. A 6-point or more increase in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression relative to the (7-14 day) previous visit defined worsening. PME was assessed through daily diaries prior to treatment. RESULTS: There were 3582 evaluable visits attended by 554 subjects. Premenopausal women had a deteriorating depressive presentation at a greater proportion of their visits (8.6%) than did postmenopausal women (4.5%, p < .01) or men (5.9%, p < .01). The presence of PME at baseline was associated with more worsenings than the absence of PME (12.0% vs. 7.3%, p < .05). Results were similar whether the subject was treated with sertraline or imipramine. Nonresponse at treatment completion was more likely among subjects with worsening (p < .01). Dropouts were more likely than completers to have had an exacerbation at their terminal visit (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Acute worsening of depression was associated with reproductive variables and negatively affected clinical trial outcomes including early treatment discontinuation and nonresponse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v68n0620

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, A. T., Silkey, B. S., Kornstein, S. G., & Clary, C. M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
68
Issue
06
Pages
951-958
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965596580
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
double depression, dysthymia, premenstrual exacerbation, premenopausal women, menopause, sertraline, imipramine, antidepressant response, treatment non-response, treatment discontinuation, reproductive factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Imipramine, Male, Menopause, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Sex Factors, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Cross-Over Studies, Dysthymic Disorder, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review