Cited by 39Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Specific Quality of Life With Triple-Bead Mixed Amphetamine Salts (SPD465) in Adults: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Spencer, Thomas J., Landgraf, Jeanne M., Adler, Lenard A., Weisler, Richard H., Anderson, Colleen S., Youcha, Sharon H.·2008·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life (QOL) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) given triple-bead mixed amphetamine salts (MAS), a long-acting amphetamine formulation designed for a duration of action of up to 16 hours. METHOD: 274 adults with ADHD (DSM-IV-TR criteria) were randomly assigned to 7 weeks of double-blind treatment with an optimal dose of triple-bead MAS (12.5 mg to 75 mg) (N = 137) or placebo (N = 137). As a secondary objective of this study, QOL was assessed on the basis of self-reported Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A) scores, describing ADHD-specific QOL in 6 domains and global QOL (questions 1-4). To assess safety, data were collected on adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, and sleep quality. The trial was conducted from January 2005 to June 2005. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement between triple-bead MAS and placebo was observed in all 6 ADHD-specific AIM-A subscales. In addition, statistically significant improvement in global QOL between triple-bead MAS and placebo was seen, based on AIM-A question 1 (p = .0006) and question 4 (p = .0001). Patients' age, gender, race, and prior use of stimulant medication were not found to significantly affect AIM-A subscale scores. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with triple-bead MAS (insomnia, dry mouth, decreased appetite, headache, and weight decreased) were consistent with amphetamine treatment, and their incidence generally decreased with time. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with ADHD showed significantly improved QOL for both ADHD-specific and global measures with triple-bead MAS in comparison to placebo, based on AIM-A scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild to moderate in intensity and were consistent with amphetamine treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00150579.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v69n1112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spencer, T. J., Landgraf, J. M., Adler, L. A., Weisler, R. H., Anderson, C. S., & Youcha, S. H.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2008-11-30
Volume
69
Issue
11
Pages
1766-1775
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000421003
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adults, quality of life, treatment-emergent adverse events, stimulant medication, insomnia
MeSH terms
Adult, Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Least-Squares Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review