Cited by 23Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Quetiapine Monotherapy as Treatment for Anxiety Symptoms in Patients With Bipolar Depression: A Pooled Analysis of Results From 2 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies

Open access
Lydiard, R. Bruce, Culpepper, Larry, Schiöler, Helena, Gustafsson, Urban, Paulsson, Björn·2009·The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine monotherapy for anxiety symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder experiencing depression in the BipOLar DEpRession (BOLDER I and II) studies. METHOD: A post hoc analysis of anxiety symptoms in 1,051 acutely depressed patients with bipolar I or II disorder (DSM-IV) from 2 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 8-week studies of quetiapine (300 or 600 mg once daily) was conducted. Anxiety symptoms were assessed using Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) total and psychic (items 1-6, 14) and somatic (items 7-13) anxiety subscale scores (mixed-model repeated measure and last-observation-carried-forward analysis of change from baseline at each assessment). The BOLDER I study was conducted between September 2002 and October 2003, and the BOLDER II study was conducted between June 2004 and August 2005. RESULTS: Mean baseline HARS total scores were similar across the treatment groups (300 mg/d: 18.9, 600 mg/d and placebo: both 18.6). There was a significantly greater improvement from baseline in mean HARS total scores at the first evaluation (week 1) in both quetiapine groups compared with placebo (300 mg/d: -4.6, P < .001 and 600 mg/d: -4.1, P = .003 vs placebo: -2.8). These improvements were sustained through week 8 with both quetiapine doses (300 mg/d: -10.1, P < .001 and 600 mg/d: -10.5, P < .001 vs placebo: -6.9). At week 8, there was also significant improvement from baseline in HARS psychic and somatic anxiety subscale scores compared with placebo (P < .001). The baseline severity of anxiety did not impact the improvement in depressive symptoms. Common adverse events included dry mouth, sedation, somnolence, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis, quetiapine monotherapy was more effective than placebo and generally well tolerated for the treatment of both depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00060489 (BOLDER I) and NCT00083954 (BOLDER II).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/pcc.08m00659

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Revised. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Press, Inc; 2004
  2. [15]15. PSYCHIATRIST.COM Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;15(5):573-585.
  3. [21]21. Kessler R. Comorbidity of unipolar and bipolar depression with other psychiatric disorders in a general population survey. In: Tohen M, ed. Comorbidity in Affective Disorders. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1999:1-25.
  4. [34]34. Weisler R, Arvekvist R, Paulsson B. Quetiapine monotherapy for treating depressive episodes of bipolar disorder. Paper presented at: 59th Institute of Psychiatric Services Conference, October 11-14, 2007; New Orleans, LA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lydiard, R. B., Culpepper, L., Schiöler, H., Gustafsson, U., & Paulsson, B.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Culpepper, Larry
Venue
The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2009-10-15
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
215-225
ISSN
  • 1523-5998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-211X
OpenAlex
W2063359938
Cited by
23
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • AstraZeneca
  • School of Medicine, Boston University
  • University of South Carolina
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
quetiapine, bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety symptoms, atypical antipsychotics, monotherapy, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, treatment efficacy, tolerability, adverse events, sedation, xerostomia, dizziness, sleepiness, dose comparison, placebo comparison, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review