Cited by 6Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthChild Abuse and Trauma

An integrative literature review on sexual abuse prevention education programs for elementary school students in South Korea

Open access
Shin, Hyewon, Lee, Jung Min, Kang, Kyung-Ah, Kim, Shin-Jeong·2019·Child Health Nursing Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review sexual abuse prevention education program for Korean elementary school students. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review methods were used and Gough's weight of evidence was employed as a quality appraisal tool. Articles published in Korean or English were identified through electronic search engines and scholarly web sites using three keywords: "elementary school student", "sexual abuse", and "prevention education". Peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2018 were included in this review. RESULTS: Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria and were appraised as being high-quality. Among the 12 selected studies, seven were descriptive, while five were intervention studies. Sexual abuse prevention education programs were effective in improving perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and preventive behaviors among elementary school students. However, deficiencies were found in the variety of educational methods, utilization of experts, and standardization of the content of sexual abuse prevention education. CONCLUSION: We need to provide various educational methods that are appropriate for specific developmental stages, and the sexual abuse prevention content should draw upon the current sexual education program administered to this population. Furthermore, parents and trained teachers or school health teachers should be included to provide effective education programs for elementary students.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4094/chnr.2019.25.4.435

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence for CSAPPs effects on disclosure is uncertain.

    “Evidence for CSAPPs effects on disclosure is uncertain, due in large part to methodological problems in program evaluations.”

    From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as Shin et al., 2019

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says the small number of experimental studies and incomplete statistical reporting limit conclusions about program effects. The Results (page unavailable) list measured outcomes as knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and self-protection, not disclosure. Thus the review supports methodological uncertainty about program effects generally, but does not establish uncertainty specifically about effects on disclosure. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most CSAPP evaluations demonstrate increases in children's factual knowledge about sexual abuse and its prevention (Davis & Gidycz, 2000; Shin et al., 2019; Topping & Barron, 2009; Walsh et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021).

    “Indeed, most CSAPP evaluations demonstrate increases in children's factual knowledge about sexual abuse and its prevention, however follow-up to test knowledge maintenance is either short (up to 6 months) or absent (Davis & Gidycz, 2000; Shin et al., 2019; Topping & Barron, 2009; Walsh et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021).”

    From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as Shin et al., 2019

    The Introduction (page not available) reports that increased sexual-abuse-related knowledge was a particularly evident effect of prevention education among elementary students. But the review’s Results section reports nonsignificant knowledge outcomes in some evaluated studies, so it does not establish that most evaluations found increases. The cited passages also do not establish the sentence’s specific claim that follow-up was absent or lasted no more than six months. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Follow-up to test knowledge maintenance in CSAPP evaluations is either short (up to 6 months) or absent (Davis & Gidycz, 2000; Shin et al., 2019; Topping & Barron, 2009; Walsh et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021).

    “Indeed, most CSAPP evaluations demonstrate increases in children's factual knowledge about sexual abuse and its prevention, however follow-up to test knowledge maintenance is either short (up to 6 months) or absent (Davis & Gidycz, 2000; Shin et al., 2019; Topping & Barron, 2009; Walsh et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2021).”

    From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as Shin et al., 2019

    The Research Results section describes pre- and post-intervention measurements, while the Discussion gives education durations of 1–8 weeks. Neither reports whether knowledge was tested later or specifies a follow-up period. Searches for knowledge maintenance and follow-up testing found no passage establishing that follow-up was absent or limited to six months. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Moon KJ Park KM Sung Y Sexual abuse prevention mobile application (SAP_MobAPP) for primary school children in Korea Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 2017 26 5 573 589 10.1080/10538712.2017.1313350 28661824 · DOI
  2. [2]Kim SJ Kang KA Effects of the child sexual abuse prevention education (C-SAPE) program on South Korean fifth-grade students' competence in terms of knowledge and self-protective behaviors The Journal of School Nursing 2017 33 2 123 132 10.1177/1059840516664182 27573418 · DOI
  3. [3]Kim SJ Kang SR Lee JM Development of a sexual abuse prevention education program for elementary school students using a hybrid application Child Health Nursing Research 2018 24 1 109 118 10.4094/chnr.2018.24.1.109 · DOI
  4. [5]Kim SJ Park SJ Kim SH Kang KA Contents analysis of sexual abuse recognized by elementary school students The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education 2013 19 4 518 530 10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.518 · DOI
  5. [6]Lee YH Han YK Kim NY The analysis of awareness of students and teachers on the school violence prevention policy: Focusing on sexual violence policy The Journal of Politics of Education 2018 25 1 31 50
  6. [7]Lee SH Park WJ Development of standard education contents and methods for the prevention of sexual violence in late school-age children using Delphi technique Korean Journal of Scientific Criminal Investigation 2013 7 4 287 296
  7. [8]Cho YR Kim JE Park KM Differences in the characteristics of sexual abuse victimization between low- and high-grade elementary school children and correlations among the characteristics Journal of Korean Community Health Nursing 2015 26 2 119 127 10.12799/jkachn.2015.26.2.119 · DOI
  8. [10]Lee HH Ha JY Practice and perception of child sexual abuse prevention education through the myths of mothers and teachers Journal of Child Welfare and Development 2013 11 2 41 66
  9. [11]Ha JY Lee HH Fear of child sexual violence, prevention behavior, and upper elementary school victims' experiences of child sexual violence Journal of Child Welfare and Development 2014 12 2 43 65
  10. [12]Fryda CM Hulme PA School-based childhood sexual abuse prevention programs: An integrative review The Journal of School Nursing 2015 31 3 167 182 10.1177/1059840514544125 25092721 · DOI
  11. [13]Kim SJ Kang KA Cho H Min HY Comparison of needs about sexual abuse prevention education between elementary school students and teachers Child Health Nursing Research 2016 22 3 215 226 10.4094/chnr.2016.22.3.215 · DOI
  12. [14]Casper R Characteristics of children who experience positive or negative reactions to a sexual abuse prevention program Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 1999 7 4 97 112 10.1300/J070v07n04_07 · DOI
  13. [16]Whittemore R Knafl K The integrative review: Updated methodology Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005 52 5 546 553 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x 16268861 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [17]Gough D Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence Research Papers in Education 2007 22 2 213 228 10.1080/02671520701296189 · DOI
  15. [18]Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman DG PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009 62 10 1006 1012 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 19631508 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [20]Yoon JH A study on children's experiences and recognitions of preventive education against sexual abuse Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 2010 23 3 59 78
  17. [22]Letourneau EJ Nietert PJ Rheingold AA Initial assessment of stewards of children program effects on child sexual abuse reporting rates in selected South Carolina counties Child Maltreatment 2016 21 1 74 79 10.1177/1077559515615232 26530898 PMC4870719 · DOI
  18. [24]Yoon JH Elementary school teachers' needs assessments and perceptions on school education program to prevent sexual abuse to children Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association 2008 20 3 231 258
  19. [26]Guse K Levine D Martins S Lira A Gaarde J Westmorland W Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: A systematic review Journal of Adolescent Health 2012 51 6 535 543 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.03.014 23174462 · DOI
  20. [27]Darcy AM Lock J Using technology to improve treatment outcomes for children and adolescents with eating disorders Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2017 26 1 33 42 10.1016/j.chc.2016.07.010 27837940 · DOI

Cited by

Authors
Shin, H., Lee, J. M., Kang, K.-A., & Kim, S.-J.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Sahmyook University (KR)
  • Hallym University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Shin-Jeong
Venue
Child Health Nursing Research
Published
2019-10-31
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
435-448
ISSN
  • 2287-9110 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-9129
OpenAlex
W2984454578
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Health Nursing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Hallym University (201903-012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
sexual abuse prevention, prevention education program, elementary school students, child sexual abuse, sex education, school-based intervention, parental involvement, teacher participation, South Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review