Cited by 65melanin and skin pigmentationColor Science and ApplicationsDermatologic Treatments and Research

Correlation between skin color evaluation by skin color scale chart and narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer

Open access
Treesirichod, Arucha, Chansakulporn, Somboon, Wattanapan, Pattra·2014·Indian Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

CONTEXT: Various methods are available for the evaluation of skin color. A skin color scale chart is a convenient and inexpensive tool. However, the correlation between a skin color scale chart and objective measurement has not been evaluated. AIMS: To assess the correlation between skin color evaluation done by a skin color scale chart (Felix von Luschan skin color chart) and a narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer (Mexameter MX18). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants were evaluated for skin color by using the Felix von Luschan skin color chart (range 1-36) and a narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer (Mexameter MX18) in which the results of the measurements were expressed as Erythema (E) and Melanin (M) indices. Skin color was measured on four different anatomical skin sites from each participant on the medial aspect of the volar and the dorsal regions of both forearms. RESULTS: A total of 208 records from 52 participants were established. The majority of participants (19.2%) were rated with the skin color scale at the number 16 (range 14-33). The mean M plus E, M, and E indices were 498.9 ± 143.9, 230.4 ± 74.4, and 268.5 ± 73.2, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the number on the skin color scale and each index: M plus E, M, and E indices were 0.90, 0.90, and 0.86, respectively, with a statistical significance of P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Skin color evaluation using a skin color scale chart has shown a high correlation with skin color evaluation done by the narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0019-5154.135476

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Darker skin contains more melanin, which absorbs more green light than lighter skin.

    “likely because darker skin contains more melanin which absorbs more green light than lighter skin.”

    From Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Discussion reports that darker skin-color classifications corresponded to higher Mexameter indices, and Materials and Methods identifies one of those as a melanin index. But the paper does not say that darker skin absorbs more green light: its Skin color assessment section says melanin was measured at red and infrared wavelengths, while green light was used for the erythema index. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inaccurate PPG heart rate measurements occur up to 15% more frequently in dark skin than in light skin.

    “previous research demonstrated that inaccurate PPG HR measurements occur up to 15% more frequently in dark skin as compared to light skin”

    From Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction states that the study compares a skin-color chart with a narrowband reflectance spectrophotometer, and the Methods describe skin-color measurements with a Mexameter MX18. Searches for PPG heart-rate accuracy, dark-versus-light-skin error rates, and 15% found no passage addressing the cited claim. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Lascari AD Carotenemia. A review Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1981 20 25 9 7449242
  2. [5]Clarys P Alewaeters K Lambrecht R Barel AO Skin color measurements: Comparison between three instruments: The Chromameter(R), the Derma Spectrometer(R) and the Mexameter(R) Skin Res Technol 2000 6 230 8 11428962

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treesirichod, A., Chansakulporn, S., & Wattanapan, P.
Affiliations
  • Srinakharinwirot University (TH)
  • Khon Kaen University (TH)
Corresponding author
Treesirichod, Arucha
Venue
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2014
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
339
ISSN
0019-5154 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069512242
Cited by
65
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
skin color assessment, erythema index, melanin index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review