Cited by 17Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Reply: Matters Arising ‘Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors’

Open access
Bent, Brinnae, Enache, Oana M., Goldstein, Benjamin, Kibbe, Warren, Dunn, Jessilyn P.·2021·npj Digital Medicine

Abstract

This is a response to the Matters Arising (MA) that examines our original article, ‘Investigating inaccuracies in wearable optical heart rate sensors’ 1 . We performed this original study to address the concern that there was inadequate published research on the potential effect of skin tone on wearable device accuracy. The central hypothesis tested in the original study was that darker skin tones have decreased photoplethysmography-based heart rate measurement accuracy as compared with lighter skin tones. The MA suggests improvements surrounding two aspects of the original study: the sample size and the use of the Fitzpatrick skin tone (FP) scale to categorize skin tones. The original study was designed and powered according to the above hypothesis. We acknowledge that visual skin tone scales are imperfect, and that a study can never prove the null hypothesis to be true. We, too, encourage more work examining wearable device accuracy across skin tones. In this reply, we aim to address questions surrounding the sample size, covariates, and choice of skin tone scale in the original article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41746-021-00409-4

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The skin color of the subject has been a major point of discussion concerning the quality of PPG recordings.

    “Prominently, the skin color of the subject has been a major point of discussion concerning the quality of PPG recordings14,47,48.”

    From Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bent, B., Enache, O. M., Goldstein, B., Kibbe, W., & Dunn, J. P.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Jessilyn P.
Venue
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
39-39
ISSN
2398-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130393823
Cited by
17
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Digital Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Whitehead Scholar
  • Forge Fellow
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
photoplethysmography, skin tone, measurement accuracy, sample size, covariates, darker skin tones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review