Cited by 139Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNoise Effects and ManagementHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Characteristics of hyperacusis in the general population

Open access
Paulin, Johan, Andersson, Linus, Nordin, Steven·2016·Noise and Health

Abstract

There is a need for better understanding of various characteristics in hyperacusis in the general population. The objectives of the present study were to investigate individuals in the general population with hyperacusis regarding demographics, lifestyle, perceived general health and hearing ability, hyperacusis-specific characteristics and behavior, and comorbidity. Using data from a large-scale population-based questionnaire study, we investigated individuals with physician-diagnosed (n = 66) and self-reported (n = 313) hyperacusis in comparison to individuals without hyperacusis (n = 2995). High age, female sex, and high education were associated with hyperacusis, and that trying to avoid sound sources, being able to affect the sound environment, and having sough medical attention were common reactions and behaviors. Posttraumatic stress disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, exhaustion, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, migraine, hearing impairment, tinnitus, and back/joint/muscle disorders were comorbid with hyperacusis. The results provide ground for future study of these characteristic features being risk factors for development of hyperacusis and/or consequences of hyperacusis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/1463-1741.189244

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults, variability of the questions asked across studies of hyperacusis significantly impacts on the ability to identify prevalence figures.

    “In adults, variability of the questions asked across studies of hyperacusis also significantly impacts on the ability to identify prevalence figures.”

    From Clinical Interventions for Hyperacusis in Adults: A Scoping Review to Assess the Current Position and Determine Priorities for Research (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says differences in hyperacusis prevalence between studies may be due to differences in question formulation, as well as differences in the populations studied. This supports the concern about comparing prevalence figures, but the claim presents the impact of question wording as definite and significant, whereas the paper offers it as a possible explanation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Anari M Axelsson A Eliasson A Magnusson L Hypersensitivity to sound: Questionnaire data, audiometry and classification Scand Audiol 2009 28 219 30 10572967
  2. [39]Westcott M Patuzzi R Case study: Management of hyperacusis associated with post-traumatic stress disorder Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar 2002 2002 Perth, Australia University of Western Australia 280 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulin, J., Andersson, L., & Nordin, S.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • University of Gävle (SE)
Corresponding author
Paulin, Johan
Venue
Noise and Health
Published
2016
Volume
18
Issue
83
Pages
178
ISSN
1463-1741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2516467696
Cited by
139
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Noise and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
hyperacusis, general population, comorbidities, risk factors, demographics, health perception, hearing loss, tinnitus, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, fibromyalgia, migraine, irritable bowel syndrome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hyperacusis, Sweden, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review