Cited by 39Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Burden of Care and Perceived Psycho-Social Outcomes among Family Caregivers of Patients Living with Cancer

Open access
Onyeneho, Chiemerigo A, Ilesanmi, Rose E·2021·Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Caring for patients living with cancer requires the support of family caregivers. Literature reports experiences of diverse burdens and health effects among caregivers. This study examined the burden, physical, psycho-social, and financial outcomes of caregiving among caregivers of patients living with cancer. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria, between January and March 2019. A convenient sample of 201 caregivers who were direct family relatives were selected to complete a validated Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Questionnaire (r = 0.994) and perceived outcomes of caregiving questionnaire. The burden scale score ranged from 0 to 20 (no burden) to 61-88 (severe burden). Other outcomes of caregiving were measured on a Likert scale 0-4 (where 2.00 is the threshold score of effect of caregiving experienced), to determine the strength of the effect of caregiving on each variable of interest. The factors that contributed to the health outcomes were also identified. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The mean age was 37.68 ± 14.29 years and majority (60.4%) were female. The mean duration of caregiving was 2.34 ± 1.14. Caregivers (44.5%) reported a mild level of the burden while 4.4% reported severe burden. The mean burden score was 28.30 ± 15.78. Findings also indicate that caregiving affected the physical health (mean = 2.58 ≥ 2.00) and social well-being (mean = 2.42 ≥ 2.00) of the caregivers. The impact on psychological health was less than the threshold value (mean = 1.88 ≤ 2.00), suggesting less impact. Some factors associated with physical effects include poor eating (mean = 2.80) and lack of sleep (mean = 2.92). However, the psychological outcomes were associated with loss of hope (mean = 1.53) and feelings of frustration (mean = 1.65). CONCLUSIONS: Reported burden of care was mild; although negative health outcomes were noted. Health-care professionals can ameliorate such effects through a regular systemic assessment with standardized instruments, for early identification and intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/2347-5625.308678

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the 10 outcome events per predictor variable rule and considering a 70% prevalence of caregiver burden using the ZBI-22 cutoff score of 21, at least 214 participants were needed for logistic regression analysis including 15 predictor variables.

    “Using the 10 outcome events per predictor variable (EPV) rule and considering a 70% prevalence of CB using the ZBI-22 cutoff score of 21 [20–24], at least 214 participants were needed for logistic regression analysis including 15 predictor variables.”

    From Caregiver burden among family caregivers of incurable cancer patients in two eastern Mediterranean countries (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Methods define a ZBI-22 score of 21 as the start of mild caregiver burden. Table 2 in the Results reports 35.7% with no burden, implying 64.3% scored 21 or higher—not the stated 70%. The 70% figure is therefore an approximate planning assumption rather than this paper’s reported prevalence; the EPV calculation and 214-participant requirement are the citing authors’ own calculation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The prevalence of caregiver burden among family caregivers of cancer patients in general using the ZBI-22 cutoff point of 21 ranged widely from 37 to 82% in other studies.

    “The prevalence of CB among FCs of cancer patients in general using the ZBI-22 cutoff point of 21 ranged widely from 37 to 82% in other studies [9, 20–25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [3]Brémault-Phillips S Parmar J Johnson M Huhn A Mann A Tian V The voices of family caregivers of seniors with chronic conditions: A window into their experience using a qualitative design Springerplus 2016 5 620 27330886 PMC4870523
  2. [5]Given BA Given CW Sherwood P The challenge of quality cancer care for family caregivers J Support Oncol 2012 28 205 12 23107177
  3. [8]Engebretson A Matrisian L Thompson C Pancreatic cancer: Patient and caregiver perceptions on diagnosis, psychological impact, and importance of support Pancreatology 2015 15 701 7 26092655
  4. [11]Veloso VI Tripodoro VA Caregivers burden in palliative care patients: A problem to tackle Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2016 10 330 5 27635764
  5. [13]Zarit SH Reever KE Back-Peterson J Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden Gerontologist 1980 20 649 55 7203086
  6. [14]Lee KC Yin JJ Lin PC Lu SH Sleep disturbances and related factors among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer Psycho Oncol 2015 24 1632 8 25871014
  7. [15]Rumpold T Schur S Amering M Kirchheiner K Masel EK Watzke H Informal caregivers of advanced-stage cancer patients: Every second is at risk for psychiatric morbidity Support Care Cancer 2016 24 1975 82 26476628
  8. [16]Akpan-Idiok PA Anarado AN Perception of burden of caregiving by informal caregivers of cancer patients attending University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria Pan Afri Med J 2014 18 159 PMC4236844 25419297
  9. [20]Martin-Carraso M Martin MF Valero CP Millan PR Garcia CI Montalban SR Effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention program in the reduction of caregiver burden in Alzheimer's disease patients' caregivers Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009 24 489 99 18949763
  10. [21]Mittelman MS Roth DL Coon DW Haley W Sustained benefit of supportive intervention for depressive symptoms in caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease Am J Psychiatry 2004 161 850 6 15121650
  11. [22]Mahoney DF Tarlow BJ Jones RN Effects of an automated telephone support system on caregiver burden and anxiety: Findings from the REACH for TLC intervention study Gerontologist 2003 43 556 67 12937334
  12. [23]Manne S Mee L Bartell A Sands S Kashy DA A randomized clinical trial of a parent-focused social-cognitive processing intervention for caregivers of children undergoing hematopoetic stem cell transplantation J Consult Clin Psychol 2016 84 389 401 26913620 PMC5580924
  13. [24]Fortune DG Smith JV Garvey K Perception of psychosis, coping, appraisals, and psychological distress in the relatives of patients with schizophrenia: An exploration using self-regulation theory Br J Clin Psychol 2011 44 3 16238880
  14. [26]Roth DL Mittelman MS Clay OJ Madan A Haley WE Changes in social support as mediators of the impact of a psychosocial intervention for spouse caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease Psychol Aging 2005 20 634 44 16420138
  15. [28]Gillick MR The critical role of caregivers in achieving patient-centered care JAMA 2013 310 575 6 23867885
  16. [29]Onyeneho CA Caregivers' Burden of Caring for Patients Living with Cancer in University College Hospital, Ibadan. An MSc Dissertation, Submitted to Department of Nursing, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria 2019
  17. [30]Choi J Hoffman LA Schulz R Ren D Donahoe MP Given B Health risk behaviors in family caregivers during patients' stay in intensive care units: A pilot analysis Am J Crit Care 2013 22 41 5 23283087 PMC4109809
  18. [31]Medic G Wille M Hemels ME Short- and long-term health consequences of sleep disruption Nat Sci Sleep 2017 9 151 61 28579842 PMC5449130

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onyeneho, C. A., & Ilesanmi, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Ibadan (NG)
  • Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University (AE)
Corresponding author
Onyeneho, Chiemerigo A
Venue
Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
330-336
ISSN
2347-5625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126659006
Cited by
39
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
family caregivers, caregiver burden, cancer caregiving, Zarit Burden Interview, physical health outcomes, psychological well-being, social well-being, financial burden, hopelessness, frustration, insufficient sleep, Nigeria, University College Hospital Ibadan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review