Cited by 20Congenital Heart Disease StudiesHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapySepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vasoactive-ventilation-renal score in predicting outcome postcardiac surgery in children

Open access
Akunuri, Shalini, Alam, Shahzad, Jain, Akanksha, Mazahir, Rufaida, Hegde, Rajesh·2018·International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate vasoactive-ventilation-renal (VVR) score to predict outcome postcardiac surgery in children and establish the time at which the score is best to predict outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: percentile) and ICU mortality. Correlation between the outcome and scores was obtained and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves generated. Independent association of the scores with the outcome was also established. RESULTS: = 0.000). CONCLUSION: VVR score is effective and robust bedside method to predict prolonged LOS and mortality postpediatric cardiac surgery. VVR score at 48 h was the best to predict outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_1_18

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akunuri, S., Alam, S., Jain, A., Mazahir, R., & Hegde, R.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Wales (GB)
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital (GB)
  • Narayana Health (IN)
Corresponding author
Akunuri, Shalini
Venue
International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science
Published
2018
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
143
ISSN
2229-5151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889645752
Cited by
20
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
pediatric cardiac surgery, postoperative outcome prediction, ICU mortality, length of hospital stay, hemodynamic instability, renal function, postoperative complications, prognostic score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review