Cited by 172Ophthalmology and Visual Health ResearchCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsEducation during COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmology training programs in India – Outcomes of a survey.

Open access
Nair, AkshayGopinathan, Mishra, Deepak, Gandhi, RashminAnilkumar, Gogate, ParikshitJ, Mathur, Satanshu, Bhushan, Prashant, Srivastav, Tanmay, Singh, Hemendra +2 more·2020·Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose: In 2020, in response to the emergence and global spread of the disease COVID-19, caused by a new variant of coronavirus 2019-nCoV, the government of India ordered a nationwide lockdown for 21 days, which was then extended to a total of over 50 days. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of the lockdown on ophthalmic training programs across India. Methods: An online survey was sent across to trainee ophthalmologists across India through various social media platforms. Results: In all, 716 trainees responded; the average age was 29.1 years. Results showed that majority of the respondents were enrolled in residency programs (95.6%; 685/716) and the others were in fellowship programs. About 24.6% (176/716) of the trainees had been deployed on 'COVID-19 screening' duties. Nearly 80.7% (578/716) of the trainees felt that the COVID-19 lockdown had negatively impacted their surgical training. Furthermore, 54.8% (392/716) of the trainees perceived an increase in stress levels during the COVID-19 lockdown and 77.4% (554/716) reported that their family members had expressed an increased concern for their safety and wellbeing since the lockdown began. In all, 75.7% (542/716) of the respondents felt that online classes and webinars were useful during the lockdown period. Conclusion: Our survey showed that majority ophthalmology trainees across the country felt that the COVID-19 lockdown adversely affected their learning, especially surgical training. While most found online classes and webinars useful, the trainees' perceived stress levels were higher than normal during the lockdown. Training hospitals should take cognizance of this and reassure trainees; formulate guidelines to augment training to compensate for the lost time as well as mitigate the stress levels upon resumption of regular hospital services and training. Going ahead, permanent changes such as virtual classrooms and simulation-based training should be considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijo.ijo_1067_20

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers in India have reported an increase in anxiety and depression among Indians owing to the pandemic.

    “Researchers in India have reported an increase in anxiety and depression among Indians, owing to the pandemic (Goyal et al., 2020; Kumar and Nayar, 2020; Mishra et al., 2020; Rehman et al., 2020; Verma and Mishra, 2020).”

    From Knowledge of COVID-19 and Its Influence on Mindfulness, Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Psychological Flexibility in the Indian Community (2020) · cites this paper as Mishra et al., 2020

    The Discussion reports anxiety and higher stress among ophthalmology trainees across India, and the Results say 54.8% reported higher-than-usual stress during lockdown. The paper does not report an increase in depression among its Indian respondents, and its findings about trainees do not establish an increase among Indians generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nair, A., Mishra, D., Gandhi, R., Gogate, P., Mathur, S., Bhushan, P., Srivastav, T., Singh, H., Sinha, B., & Singh, M.
Affiliations
  • Aditya Jyot Eye Hospital (IN)
  • Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Nair, AkshayGopinathan
Venue
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2020
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
999
ISSN
0301-4738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032084305
Cited by
172
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 27
FWCI
32.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, ophthalmology residency training, surgical training disruption, perceived stress, online learning, webinars, simulation-based training, India
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, India, Internship and Residency, Male, Middle Aged, Ophthalmology, Pneumonia, Viral, Quarantine, Contact Tracing, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review