Cited by 15Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareNursing care and research

Availability of Informal Caregivers for Palliative Care Patients with Cancer: Is there a Difference between Higher- and Lower-Income Settings.

Open access
Shohdy, KyrillusS, Abdel-Malek, Raafat, Farag, DinaE, Cox, Sarah·2019·Indian Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract

Family caregivers are the default caring personnel for terminal cancer patients. The characteristics, demographics, distribution, psychological burden, and socioeconomic standards differ between high- and low-income countries. We aimed to assess those factors and their direct reflection on both the patient and the caregiver.This is a comparative cross-sectional study for terminal cancer patients in the palliative care unit between the United Kingdom (UK) as a high-income community and Egypt as a low-income community. We assessed the different characteristics, demographics, living place, the degree of relevance, and the availability of caregivers.We have recruited 216 patients from the UK and 117 patients from Egypt. Informal caregivers were available in 74.5% and 92.3% for these patients with a mean age of 71.5 (standard deviation [SD] 16) years and 50.9 (SD 15.18) years, respectively. There has been a statistically significant difference between the two countries' caregivers in being married, family, and living in the same household (P < 0.0001).Low-income countries are more common to have an informal caregiver who is a family member of different degree of relevance. Caregivers in low-income settings tend to be younger, of the female gender, married, and living in the same household than in high-income ones.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_199_18

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Mor V Allen S Malin M The psychosocial impact of cancer on older versus younger patients and their families Cancer 1994 74 2118 27 8087779

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shohdy, K., Abdel-Malek, R., Farag, D., & Cox, S.
Affiliations
  • Cairo University (EG)
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2019
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
379
ISSN
0973-1075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971465698
Cited by
15
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Indian Journal of Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
informal caregivers, family caregivers, palliative care, terminal cancer, caregiver availability, caregiver demographics, caregiver gender, caregiver age, socioeconomic status, United Kingdom, Egypt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review