Cited by 190COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutHealthcare Systems and Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attitude, practice, behavior, and mental health impact of COVID-19 on doctors

Open access
Bhattacharyya, Ranjan, Chatterjee, SeshadriSekhar, Bhattacharyya, Sumita, Gupta, Sukanya, Das, Soumitra, Banerjee, BejoyBikram·2020·Indian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19, like every other pandemic, has imposed an unprecedented threat to doctors' physical and mental health. Literature in this area is sparse. The present study has been done to explore the knowledge, attitude, and behavior of doctors regarding this pandemic and how it influences their depression, anxiety, and stress level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This online survey has been done for 10 days. Data were collected on background characteristics, knowledge, attitude, and behavior of the respondents in a semi-structured pro forma, and psychiatric morbidity was measured by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21. A total of 152 complete responses have been received. The data were assessed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Out of 152 study participants, 34.9% were depressed and 39.5% and 32.9% were having anxiety and stress, respectively. Significant predictors for psychiatric morbidities were experience in health sector, duty hours, use of protective measures, and altruistic coping. Multivariable logistic regression showed most of the factors to be significantly associated with depression, anxiety, and stress level. DISCUSSION: Doctors who were working during COVID pandemic have a high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity. Age and having multiple comorbidities are significant predictive factors. Adequate protective measures should be warranted. Altruistic coping and a sense of greater goal are significant among the doctor community, in this pressing time. The doctors are pushing themselves to the best of their capacity and also protecting their patients' best interest. A large-scale, multicentric study will probably give a larger picture and will guide us for better service planning and delivery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/psychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_333_20

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Bhattacharyya, R., Chatterjee, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Gupta, S., Das, S., & Banerjee, B.
Affiliations
  • Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital (IN)
  • ESI - Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science and Research (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Bhattacharyya, Ranjan
  • Bhattacharyya, Sumita
Venue
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2020
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
257
ISSN
0019-5545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025481956
Cited by
190
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 39
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, physicians, mental health, depression, anxiety, stress, psychiatric morbidity, knowledge, attitude and behavior, protective measures, duty hours, comorbidities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review