Cited by 845COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Depression, anxiety, stress levels of physicians and associated factors in Covid-19 pandemics

Open access
Elbay, Rümeysa Yeni, Kurtulmuş, Ayşe, Arpacıoğlu, Selim, Karadere, Emrah·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Aim To investigate anxiety, stress, and depression levels of physicians during the Covid-19 outbreak and explored associated factors in both clinical and general site.Methods An online survey is conducted to asses psychological responses of healthcare workers and related factors during Covid-19 outbreak. It is consisted of three subsections covering the following areas: 1) sociodemographic data 2) information on individuals` working condition 3) Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DAS-21).Results Of all 442 participants, 286 (64.7%) had symptoms of depression, 224 (51.6%) anxiety, and 182 (41.2%) stress. Being female, young, and single, having less work experience, working in frontline were associated with higher scores, whereas having a child was associated with lower scores in each subscale. Factors found to be associated with higher DAS-21 total scores in frontline workers were as follows: increased weekly working hours, increased number of Covid-19 patients cared for, lower level of support from peers and supervisors, lower logistic support, and lower feelings of competence during Covid-19 related tasks.Conclusions Our findings highlight the factors which need to be taken into consideration to protect the mental wellbeing of doctors while fighting with a disaster that has major impacts on society worldwide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113130

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elbay, R. Y., Kurtulmuş, A., Arpacıoğlu, S., & Karadere, E.
Affiliations
Medeniyet Üniversitesi Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Elbay, Rümeysa Yeni
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
290
Pages
113130
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032520924
Cited by
845
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 273 · 2021: 218 · 2020: 56
FWCI
71.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
depression, anxiety, stress, physicians, healthcare workers, COVID-19 pandemic, frontline workers, mental health, working conditions, logistics support, professional competence, working hours
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review