Cited by 7,750Computational and Text Analysis MethodsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsEducational Research and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Basic Content Analysis

Weber, Robert·1990·Sage eBooks

Abstract

Introduction Content Classification and Interpretation Techniques of Content Analysis Issues in Content Analysis

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412983488

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,025

Metadata

Authors
Weber, R.
Corresponding author
Weber, Robert
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
1990
OpenAlex
W2016364797
Cited by
7,750
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 244 · 2024: 326 · 2023: 353 · 2022: 364 · 2021: 368 · 2020: 380 · 2019: 388 · 2018: 361 · 2017: 395 · 2016: 362 · 2015: 407 · 2014: 409 · 2013: 413 · 2012: 352
FWCI
23.81
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Analysis
Keywords
content analysis, content classification, interpretation methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review