Cited by 13,919Phenomenology and Existential PhilosophyResearch in Social SciencesPhilosophy and Phenomenology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phenomenological research methods

Moustakas, Clark·1994·Sage eBooks

Abstract

Human Science Perspectives and Models Transcendental Phenomenology Conceptual Framework Phenomenology and Human Science Inquiry Intentionality, Noema and Noesis Epoche, Phenomenological Reduction, Imaginative Variation and Synthesis Methods and Procedures for Conducting Human Science Research Phenomenological Research Analyses and Examples Summary, Implications and Outcomes A Phenomenological Analysis

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781412995658

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,021

Metadata

Authors
Moustakas, C.
Corresponding author
Moustakas, Clark
Venue
Sage eBooks
Published
1994
OpenAlex
W1859502711
Cited by
13,919
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 636 · 2025: 795 · 2024: 762 · 2023: 776 · 2022: 804 · 2021: 797 · 2020: 825 · 2019: 780 · 2018: 636 · 2017: 717 · 2016: 809 · 2015: 927 · 2014: 746 · 2013: 715 · 2012: 607
FWCI
12.32
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sage eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Research in Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies
Keywords
phenomenological research methods, transcendental phenomenology, intentionality, noesis and noema, phenomenological reduction, synthesis, phenomenological analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review