Cited by 0Technostress in Professional SettingsEthics and Social Impacts of AIEducational Leadership and Innovation

Into the Unknown: AI Adoption and Job Satisfaction of Christian Faculty

Open access
Manicone, Hailey A, B, Roger, FelixOtuorimuo, Ireremena E, Graf, Linnaya M, Joseph, RachelA A, Moore, Erica Danielle, Wilson, Joshua E·2026·Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to capture the lived experiences of faculty members at Christian higher education institutions regarding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on faculty job satisfaction. The study addressed two primary research questions: (1) What are the perceptions of Christian higher education faculty regarding expectations related to their use of AI in teaching? (2) How do these perceptions influence their job satisfaction? A transcendental phenomenological approach was used to gather data from six participants from a faith-based institution in the southeastern United States through individual interviews, focus groups, and journal prompts. Analysis followed Moustakas’ (1994) four-step process: epoché, phenomenological reduction, imaginative variation, and synthesis of composite textural and structural descriptions. Seven themes emerged. The first four, Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity vs. Dehumanization, addressed faculty perceptions of AI. The remaining three, Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences, highlighted how perceptions influenced job satisfaction. Findings suggest that most faculty perceived AI as a positive influence on job satisfaction, but there is a need for institutional guidelines and support for ethical AI integration. This study highlighted the affective and ethical dimensions of AI in Christian higher education. Findings indicate a need for balance between human connection and technological aspects of AI. Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame. Future research includes exploring institutional readiness, communication strategies, and comparisons between faith-based and secular institutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70623/ohtr6058

Cites

0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

10 of 44 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Faculty tend to accept and adopt technology if the institution they work at supports the technology and trains them on it.

    “Faculty tend to accept and adopt technology if the institution they work at supports the technology and trains them on it (Dangi & Saat, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dangi & Saat, 2021 source

      In “Indirect Effects on ACPU, ACPEU, and ACAU” (page unavailable), the paper identifies training as a form of institutional support and reports that higher support can increase accounting educators’ intention to adopt educational technology. The claim extends that finding to faculty generally and to actual acceptance and adoption, whereas the study reports intentions; it also notes that support does not significantly increase intention when educators consider a technology impractical. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Teacher satisfaction in Christian education is more connected to faith integration and self-efficacy than to other factors.

    “However, teacher satisfaction in Christian education is more connected to faith integration (Syptak et al., 2016) and self-efficacy (Sum & Oancea, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Syptak et al., 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sum & Oancea, 2022 source

      The Sum and Oancea citation is attached to the self-efficacy part of the sentence. The Findings discuss teachers’ confidence in emergency remote teaching and their satisfaction with aspects of that experience, but do not link self-efficacy to teacher satisfaction in Christian education or compare it with other factors. Searches for self-efficacy, satisfaction, and Christian education found no passage addressing that relationship; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The experience of mixed emotional responses and ethical navigation among Christian faculty was supported by literature.

    “The experience of mixed emotional responses and ethnical navigation was supported by literature (Hagendorff, 2020;Mamo et al., 2024;Mittelstadt, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hagendorff, 2020 source

      Section 4.2 (page unavailable) discusses situation-specific ethical deliberation by technology developers, which supports the ethical-navigation aspect in a general AI context. It does not report mixed emotional responses or examine Christian faculty, so it cannot substantiate those parts of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Mamo et al., 2024 source
    • cites Mittelstadt, 2019 source

      Section 2.2, “Professional history and norms” (page unavailable), discusses AI developers navigating conflicting ethical concepts and moral dilemmas. It does not address mixed emotional responses or the experiences of Christian faculty, so it supports only the general ethical-navigation aspect of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    The use of AI as a filter is balanced by expert prompting and final oversight of the human faculty.

    “However, this is balanced by expert prompting and final oversight of the human faculty (Chounta et al., 2022;Crockle et al., 2022;Ofosu-Ampong, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chounta et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Crockle et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ofosu-Ampong, 2024 source

      The Discussion (section 5.4) calls for considering the human element in AI adoption, and the measurement items say AI should complement the instructor’s role. Neither passage addresses expert prompting or final faculty oversight. Searches for those terms and for AI as a filter found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    A consistent subtheme was concern about AI as something to have a healthy respect for as a potential danger, threat, or something to fear or avoid.

    “There was also a consistent subtheme in expressing a concern of AI as something to have a healthy respect for as a potential danger, threat, or something to fear or avoid.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 67
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Those who have a higher theoretical and practical understanding of AI are more ready to use it and have a more positive attitude toward it.

    “Those who have a higher theoretical and practical understanding of AI are more ready to use it and have a more positive attitude toward it (Jöhnk, et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jöhnk, et al., 2021 source

      The Knowledge discussion (section 4.3; page unavailable in our copy) says AI awareness helps employees understand AI’s applications and form adequate expectations. The change-management discussion says explaining AI’s benefits can increase employee acceptance. But the paper addresses organizational readiness; it does not establish that people with greater theoretical and practical understanding are individually more ready to use AI or have more positive attitudes than others. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Those who are not as ready to use AI have a hard time trusting the tool and fear that AI will cause them to lose their jobs.

    “Those who are not as ready note that they have a hard time trusting the tool and fear that AI will cause them to lose their jobs (Chounta et al., 2022;Ofosu-Ampong, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chounta et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Ofosu-Ampong, 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Member checking, triangulation, and bracketing were additional strategies used to ensure trustworthiness.

    “Additional strategies to ensure trustworthiness included member checking, triangulation, and bracketing (Yadav, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yadav, 2022 source

      Table 6 (Declarations; page unavailable) lists triangulation and respondent validation—presenting tentative analyses to respondents for feedback—as strategies to enrich trustworthiness. It also lists reflexivity about researcher preconceptions and biases, but does not identify bracketing as a strategy, so that part of the cited list is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Perceived behavioral control is a construct of the Theory of Planned Behavior and has been found to be statistically significant in the intention to use AI among program designers and higher educators.

    “Perceived behavioral control is a construct of the Theory of Planned Behavior and has been found to be statistically significant in the intention to use AI among program designers and higher educators (Ivanov et al., 2024;Jiao & Cao, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ivanov et al., 2024 source
    • cites Jiao & Cao, 2024 source

      The TPB literature-review section identifies perceived behavioral control as a TPB construct. The Findings (Structural model; page unavailable) report a significant positive association with intention to use AI-aided design (b = 0.556, p < 0.001). However, the Methods (Participants; page unavailable) describe art-and-design students and design practitioners, not specifically program designers or higher educators; this paper does not support those population labels. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The first four themes addressed faculty perceptions of AI, and the remaining three themes highlighted how those perceptions influenced job satisfaction.

    “The first four, Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity vs. Dehumanization, addressed faculty perceptions of AI.The remaining three, Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences, highlighted how perceptions influenced job satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four themes answered research question one, with three of those themes having subthemes, and three themes answered research question two.

    “Four themes were generated answering research question one with three of the themes having subthemes and three themes were generated answering research question two.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Seven themes emerged from the analysis of the data.

    “Seven themes emerged.”
    • Also stated in: § Findings · plain
      “There were seven total themes generated from a list of 95 total codes to answer the two research questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A codebook was created with a total of 95 unique codes and associated quotes.

    “A codebook was created with a total of 95 unique codes and associated quotes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants' lived experiences with AI use yielded three subthemes: growth in AI proficiency, emotional responses to AI, and viewing AI as an antagonist.

    “Three specific subthemes came out of their lived experiences related to (1) growth in proficiency in the use of AI, (2) emotional responses in the use of AI, and (3) viewing AI as an antagonist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All six participants described struggling with determining clear ethical boundaries for AI use in their work roles and navigating internal conflicts about AI use.

    “All six participants described struggling with determining clear ethical boundaries for use of AI in their work roles, as well as navigating internal conflicts in the use of AI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All participants described utilizing AI to assist with job responsibilities, and use of AI as a tool was a notable finding.

    “A notable finding that emerged from the data included the use of AI as a tool.All participants in the study described utilizing AI to assist with job responsibilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants were working through the challenge of using AI themselves while informing and reminding students that they could not use AI in their courses.

    “Participants are working through the challenges of using AI themselves while informing and reminding students they could not use AI in their courses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants' responses about expectations related to AI use and job satisfaction ranged widely.

    “There was a wide range of responses from the participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although institutional leadership has provided guidance, it is difficult to implement at the faculty level.

    “Though institutional leadership has provided guidance, it is difficult to implement at the faculty level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some faculty emphasized the importance of human authenticity to the teaching process and felt that overuse of AI in the classroom dehumanized the experience for faculty and students.

    “Some faculty emphasized the importance of the human authenticity to the teaching process and felt that the overuse of AI in the classroom dehumanized the experience for the faculty and student.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Collectively, participants expressed distinct limitations of AI and the importance of human expertise, embodied teaching practices, and empathy from lived experience.

    “Collectively, the participants expressed the distinct limitations of AI and the importance of human expertise, embodied teaching practices, and empathy from lived experience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Faculty valued human authenticity when generating course content and considered a need to limit how AI-generated content is integrated into a course.

    “Faculty expressed the value of human authenticity when generating course content, though the need to limit how AIgenerated content is integrated into a course was considered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    AI goes beyond task support by allowing participants to generate assignments and further engage students.

    “However, AI goes beyond task support by allowing participants to generate assignments and further engage students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants found AI's lack of lived experience to contextualize responses problematic, even though AI can generate empathetic statements.

    “While AI can generate empathetic statements, participants found the lack of lived experience to contextualize the response to be problematic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    There is an underlying emphasis on the importance of the distinct human contribution as a faculty member.

    “However, there is an underlying emphasis on the importance of the distinct human contribution as a faculty member.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Paul, as a faculty mentor, is working to bridge the gap between AI and faculty.

    “Paul, as a faculty mentor, is working to bridge the gap between AI and faculty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Subthemes focused specifically on internal conflicts, setting appropriate ethical boundaries, and unethical uses of AI.

    “Subthemes focused specifically on internal conflicts, setting appropriate ethical boundaries, and unethical uses of AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Much of the disapproval of AI comes from the inability of AI to provide hands-on training.

    “Much of the disapproval comes from the inability of AI to provide hands-on training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    All participants were Christians teaching in a Christian institution.

    “All the participants are Christians teaching in a Christian institution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Each of the core themes was linked back to previous literature.

    “each of the themes were also linked back to previous literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Paul emphasized the importance of AI users coming together to pioneer boundaries and best practices.

    “Additionally, Paul emphasized the importance of coming together, as AI users, to work together to pioneer those boundaries and best practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    While the dehumanizing quality of AI was negatively perceived, a productive application was discovered by the participant.

    “It is interesting to note that, while the dehumanizing quality of AI was negatively perceived, a productive application was discovered by the participant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some participants expressed a desire to be ahead of others in AI use.

    “Some expressed the desire to be ahead of others in the use of AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    AI was used for the creation of case studies, review questions, games, and test bank creation.

    “AI was also used for the creation of case studies, review questions, games, and test bank creation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported that students can misinterpret the attitude or tone of their email communication and that AI is particularly useful for revising to address these issues.

    “They reported that students can misinterpret the attitude or tone of their email communication, and that AI is particularly useful for revising to address these issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although participants acknowledged a need to instruct students in AI technology, logistical, ethical, and practical boundaries still need to be established or clarified.

    “While there is an acknowledgement that there is a need to instruct students in this developing technology, there are still logistical, ethical, and practical boundaries that need to be established or clarified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants had varying experiences with AI use, and several expressed concerns over that use.

    “The participants had varying experiences with AI use and several expressed concerns over that use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Several faculty members reported that job expectations in a Christian institution are higher.

    “Several faculty members reported that job expectations in a Christian institution are higher.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Participants taught different disciplines and thus had varied experiences.

    “However, they teach different disciplines and thus have varied experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While some boundaries such as plagiarism, academic misconduct, and Turnitin rules are clearer, some faculty wrestle with what AI tools or processes are appropriate to teach students.

    “While some boundaries are clearer, such as rules regarding plagiarism, academic misconduct, and the use of Turnitin, some faculty wrestle with what, if any, AI tools or processes are appropriate to teach students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    To model behavior for future teachers, faculty modeled their behavior and guided students.

    “To model the behavior for future teachers, the faculty modeled their behavior and guided them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Due to the lack of well-established norms for AI, Paul relied on self-training to learn about AI.

    “Due to the lack of well-established norms when dealing with AI, Paul had to rely on self-training to learn about AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    When AI is efficient in saving time to complete tasks, using AI preserves time for better and more effective interaction.

    “However, when AI is efficient in saving time to complete their tasks, using AI preserves time for better and effective interaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    There are disparate views regarding what is and is not appropriate AI usage.

    “There are disparate views regarding what is and is not appropriate AI usage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Each of the core themes was supported throughout the data.

    “each of the core themes were supported throughout the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although technology can be leveraged effectively in various ways, AI has limitations as requests become more specialized.

    “While technology can be leveraged effectively in a variety of ways, there are limitations as the requests of AI become more specialized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first four themes-Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity versus Dehumanization-spoke to the initial research question focused on faculty experience utilizing AI in teaching.

    “The first four themes, Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity versus Dehumanization, spoke to the initial research question which focused on faculty experience utilizing AI in teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The participants provided rich, detailed narratives about their perceptions, thoughts, and feelings regarding their utilization of AI and how that utilization influenced their job satisfaction.

    “The participants provided rich, detailed narratives about their perceptions, thoughts, and feelings regarding their utilization of AI”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The participants in the study expressed negative or positive job satisfaction concerning AI usage.

    “The participants in the study expressed negative or positive job satisfaction concerning AI usage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    This study explored and presented the lived experiences of a sample of six Christian higher education faculty members.

    “This study explored and presented the lived experiences of a sample of six Christian higher education faculty members.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The second research question focused on how these perceptions affected their job satisfaction and includes themes of Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences with AI on Job Satisfaction.

    “The second research question focused on how these perceptions affected their job satisfaction and includes themes of Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences with AI on Job Satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some faculty raised questions about whether AI is applicable to all disciplines.

    “While the faculty expressed concerns and delight for the use of AI through their statements, some raised questions about whether it is applicable to all disciplines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Findings from this study aligned with Schreiner's three dimensions for job expectations through a Christian lens.

    “Findings from this study aligned with these dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Paul expressed a similar attitude when he said Christian institutions must be pioneers or leaders in the use of AI.

    “Paul expressed a similar attitude when he said Christian institutions must be pioneers or leaders in the use of AI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The data collection process revealed 95 unique codes which were condensed into seven overarching themes representing these lived experiences.

    “The data collection process revealed 95 unique codes which were condensed into seven overarching themes representing these lived experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Bracketing was performed prior to interviews to minimize researcher bias.

    “Bracketing was performed prior to interviews to minimize researcher bias (Moustakas, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moustakas, 1994 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Teacher satisfaction with AI is predicated on multiple factors, including teacher attitudes toward AI, confidence in using AI, ability to automate administrative tasks, training in AI use, and supportive leadership and a collaborative school culture.

    “Teacher satisfaction with AI is predicated on multiple factors.These include teacher attitudes toward the use of AI, teacher confidence in using AI, the ability to automate administrative tasks, training in the use of AI, and supportive leadership and a collaborative school culture (Bawaneh et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bawaneh et al., 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    How to effectively implement AI in higher education institutions is not clear.

    “However, how to effectively implement AI in higher education institutions (HEI) is not clear (Ofusu-Ampong, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ofusu-Ampong, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The transcripts were cleaned, read, and reread independently by all seven researchers, and the team developed meaning units (codes).

    “The transcripts were cleaned, read, and reread independently by all seven researchers and the team developed meaning units (codes).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each theme and subtheme is supported by participant quotes.

    “Each of the themes and subthemes are supported by participant quotes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study had a short time frame.

    “Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Each code was validated with quotes.

    “Each code was then validated with quotes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Three data collection methods-semi-structured interviews, Canvas discussion board focus groups, and Canvas journal entries-ensured triangulation and enhanced the trustworthiness of the findings.

    “Three data collection methods, which were semi-structured interviews, canvas discussion board focus groups, and Canvas journal entries, ensured triangulation and enhanced the trustworthiness of the findings (Creswell & Poth, 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Creswell & Poth, 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.

    “The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    A transcendental phenomenological approach was appropriate for capturing and describing participants' lived experiences.

    “This approach was appropriate as it emphasizes understanding participants' experiences from their own perspectives, aligning with the study's aim to capture and describe these lived experiences (Moustakas, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moustakas, 1994 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Social desirability was a limitation of the study.

    “Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study had a small sample size.

    “Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To ensure confidentiality, pseudonyms were assigned and all data were stored in a password-protected Canvas shell accessible only to the research team.

    “To ensure confidentiality, pseudonyms were assigned, and all data were stored in a password-protected Canvas shell accessible only to the research team.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.

    “Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All seven researchers met, debated, and formulated the final themes.

    “All seven researchers met, debated, and formulated the final themes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    An audit trail was maintained throughout the research process to ensure trustworthiness and confirmability.

    “To ensure trustworthiness and confirmability, an audit trail was maintained throughout the research process (Hayashi et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hayashi et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Lack of authoritative institutional boundaries results in confusion about what generated content is appropriate and leads to fear and discomfort as participants navigate evolving technology.

    “This lack of authoritative institutional boundaries not only results in confusion regarding what kind of generated content is appropriate but leads to fear and discomfort as participants work to navigate this evolving technology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    When used appropriately, AI can improve the productivity of faculty in higher education and allow for faculty to teach more effectively through active learning and engaging activities.

    “When used appropriately, AI can improve the productivity of faculty in higher education and allow for faculty to teach more effectively through active learning and engaging activities (Bawaneh et al., 2025;Moore & Lookadoo, 2024;Nararetsky et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bawaneh et al., 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Moore & Lookadoo, 2024 source
    • cites Nararetsky et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The novelty and evolution of AI technology put pressure on faculty to become experts and participate in pioneering standards.

    “However, the novelty and evolution of the technology put pressure on the faculty to become experts and participate in the pioneering of these standards.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Written communication may lack the vocal affectations and body language needed to fully express the intent of the faculty's feedback.

    “Written communication may lack the vocal affectations and body language needed to fully express the intent of the faculty's feedback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Navigating how to mentor and lead students through appropriate AI use is challenging for Christian educators who reportedly hold themselves to high ethical standards when there are not always clear and specific rules and much of AI use is subjective.

    “Navigating how to mentor and lead students through appropriate use is challenging, as Christian educators who reportedly hold themselves to high ethical standards when there are not always clear and specific rules, and much of AI use is subjective.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    One would expect several Christian universities will also take bold steps to develop a Christian framework to foster AI use for kingdom advancement.

    “As the University of South Florida had the vision”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kam & Kim, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nam, 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Young-Ju Ham, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Through his statement, Paul indicated that faculty in Christian higher education must be willing to adopt innovations sooner rather than later.

    “Through his statement, he indicated that faculty in Christian higher education must be willing to adopt innovations sooner rather than later.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Sulkowski et al. challenged Christian universities to integrate AI and similar technologies to enhance student learning experiences for future opportunities and development.

    “Sulkowski et al. (2024) challenged Christian universities to integrate AI and similar technologies to enhance student learning experiences for future opportunities and development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sulkowski et al., 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Self-report may force participants to make socially acceptable statements.

    “Additionally, self-report may force participants to make socially acceptable statements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lang described the responsibility of Christian institutions to lead the way on ethical AI adoption and even establish AI institutes so that innovations can be made for the greater good.

    “Lang (2023a) described the responsibility of Christian institutions to lead the way on ethical AI adoption and even establish AI institutes, as demonstrated by the University of South Florida, so that innovations can be made for the greater good (2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lang, 2023a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    While desiring to support their faculty, the rapid evolution of AI technology and its diverse applications make crafting a one-size-fits-all solution difficult.

    “While desiring to support their faculty, the rapid evolution of this technology and its diverse applications make crafting a one-size-fits-all solution difficult (Yarovenko et al., 2024;Jun-Seop & Ham, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Yarovenko et al., 2024 source
    • cites Jun-Seop & Ham, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The role of faculty and the type of tool available may impact their job satisfaction.

    “The role of faculty and the type of tool available may impact their job satisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The interviews were completed back-to-back.

    “The interviews were completed back-toback.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The faith integration of AI into educational curricula would ensure the spiritual and ethical objectives of Christian learning are not compromised but rather serve as a tool to fulfill God's purpose in education.

    “The faith integration of Artificial intelligence (AI) into educational curricula would ensure the spiritual and ethical objectives of Christian learning are not compromised but rather serve as a tool to fulfill God's purpose in education.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The novelty and rapid evolution of AI provide an opportunity for faculty who use this technology to set the standard rather than have it imposed upon them.

    “However, this does provide an opportunity for faculty who use this technology to set the standard rather than have it imposed upon them.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Role modeling by faculty can result in personal fulfillment and affect meaningful change in the community.

    “Role modeling by faculty can result in personal fulfillment and affect meaningful change in the community (Lee et al., 2024;Schreiner, 2018Schreiner, , 2022)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2024 source
    • cites Schreiner, 2018 source
    • cites Schreiner, 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Kim and Lee et al. warned that institutions must establish guidelines for proper AI use, especially in Christian settings.

    “Kim (2020) and Lee et al. (2024) warned that institutions must establish guidelines for proper AI use, especially in Christian settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kim, 2020 source
    • cites Lee et al., 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Christian universities can take the lead from the University of South Florida to the next level where faculty and students learn and practice ethical use of AI in their day-to-day lives.

    “While several universities are following the lead from the University of South Florida, Christian universities can take it to the next level where faculty and students learn and practice ethical use of AI in their day-to-day lives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The research questions and the purpose were predetermined for the group because the study was facilitated by an organized faculty training event.

    “The research questions and the purpose were predetermined for the group since this was facilitated by an organized faculty training event.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    While recurring themes were noted, the data were not quantified.

    “While recurring themes were noted, the data were not quantified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Schreiner identified three dimensions for job expectations through a Christian lens: individual growth, communal benefit, and Kingdom advancement.

    “Schreiner (2018Schreiner ( , 2022) ) identified three dimensions for job expectations through a Christian lens: individual growth, communal benefit, and Kingdom advancement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Schreiner, 2018 source
    • cites Schreiner, 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    New faculty must be oriented to multifaceted professional development, including the use of AI and related organizational policies, so that they will adopt appropriate AI functions.

    “New faculty must be oriented to the multifaceted professional development, including the use of AI and related organizational policies so that they will adopt the appropriate AI functions as they continue their journey as faculty (Cockle et al., 2022;Sulkowski et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cockle et al., 2022 source
    • cites Sulkowski et al., 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Through faculty experimentation and collaboration, faculty may be best suited to establish the boundaries and best practices to ensure optimal learning experiences for students.

    “While this may result in a period of uncertainty, through faculty experimentation and collaboration, they may be best suited to establish the boundaries and best practices to ensure optimal learning experiences for students (Kam & Kim, 2024;Nam. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kam & Kim, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Nam. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Implications of this research speak to the importance of the varied and diverse lived experiences of Christian higher education faculty and staff in utilizing AI, and how this might translate into desired training, guidance, policies and organizational structures for the future.

    “to the importance of the varied and diverse lived experiences of Christian higher education faculty and staff in utilizing AI, and how this might translate into desired training, guidance, policies and organizational structures for the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While this study was limited in scope, its implications require the need for Christian educators to align with the changing dynamics of the digital era, while remaining rooted in biblical principles and its foundational mission.

    “While this study was limited in scope, its implications require the need for Christian educators to align with the changing dynamics of the digital era, while remaining rooted in biblical principles and its foundational mission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The novelty and rapid evolution of AI have left university leadership in a difficult position.

    “This has left university leadership in a difficult position.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: AI is having a sweeping impact on nearly every field and thereby affecting the vast majority of faculty.
    • Rests on an assumption: AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
92 of 92
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Understanding how AI is experienced and adopted by Christian higher education faculty and its impact on their job satisfaction remains unknown.

    “However, understanding the trajectory of how AI is experienced and adopted by Christian higher education faculty and its impact on their job satisfaction remains to be known.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a critical gap in the literature: the absence of the voice of Christian faculty.

    “A critical gap in the literature is the absence of the voice of Christian facultythose who approach this journey not only as educators but as spiritual leaders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Christian faculty approach AI as spiritual leaders and bring a distinctive lens where discernment, purpose, and calling intersect with digital innovation.

    “Their perspective brings a distinctive lens, where discernment, purpose, and calling intersect with digital innovation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Christian faith or working in a Christian institution is a meaningful factor shaping faculty perceptions of AI and job satisfaction.

    “All the participants are Christians teaching in a Christian institution.However, they teach different disciplines and thus have varied experiences.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI is having a sweeping impact on nearly every field and thereby affecting the vast majority of faculty.

    “Unlike many technologies that are developed for specific industries and become democratized over time, AI is having a sweeping impact on nearly every field and thereby affecting the vast majority of faculty.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.

    “Because of the novelty of this technology and the persistent evolution of the tools, a burden has been placed on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.

    “Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The significance of the topic of AI in higher education relates directly to the pervasiveness of AI and to its expanding impact on higher education.

    “The significance of this topic relates directly to the pervasiveness of AI and to its expanding impact on higher education.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The named analysis step changes between sections

    Minor

    The abstract identifies phenomenological reduction as the second analysis step, while the Data Analysis section calls it education.

  • Syptak citation year differs from its reference

    Minor

    The text cites Syptak and colleagues as a 2016 source, whereas the matching reference is dated 1996.

  • Karaca study has conflicting publication years

    Minor

    The introduction dates the cited tool-development study to 2022, but the reference list dates it to 2021.

  • Tufano study has conflicting publication years

    Minor

    The discussion of nurse educators dates the study to 2023, but its reference-list entry gives 2003.

4 of 4

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3]3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2025). Qualitative inquiry and research design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  2. [12]12. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snydermann, B. (1959). The motivation to work. Wiley.
  3. [17]17. Kam, S., & Kim, M. (2024). A study on the development of ai utilization guide components at a Christian university. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 77, 171-201. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2024..77.009 · DOI
  4. [20]20. King James Bible. (2017). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1769)
  5. [33]33. Nam, S. (2023). Implications for the direction of Christian education in the age of Artificial intelligence. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 74, 107-134. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2023..74.005 · DOI
  6. [36]36. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320.
  7. [41]41. Sulkowski, Ł., Kolasińska-Morawska, K., Brzozowska, M., Morawski, P., & Seliga, R. (2024). Application of e-learning platforms by higher education institutions during the COVID- 19 pandemic: the Polish perspective. Human Technology, 20(3), 446-467. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3. · DOI
  8. [43]43. Syptak, J.M., & Marsland, D., & Ulmer, D. (1996). Job satisfaction: Putting theory into practice. Family Practice Management, 6(9), 26-30.

Authors
Manicone, H. A., B, R., FelixOtuorimuo, I. E., Graf, L. M., Joseph, R. A., Moore, E. D., & Wilson, J. E.
Affiliations
Liberty University (US)
Venue
Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning
Published
2026-06-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
3068-7470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7170427720
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Locations
  • Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons (Liberty University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
Keywords
artificial intelligence in higher education, faculty satisfaction, Christian higher education, AI in teaching, ethical use of AI, human authenticity, dehumanization, institutional support for AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review