Into the Unknown: AI Adoption and Job Satisfaction of Christian Faculty
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to capture the lived experiences of faculty members at Christian higher education institutions regarding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on faculty job satisfaction. The study addressed two primary research questions: (1) What are the perceptions of Christian higher education faculty regarding expectations related to their use of AI in teaching? (2) How do these perceptions influence their job satisfaction? A transcendental phenomenological approach was used to gather data from six participants from a faith-based institution in the southeastern United States through individual interviews, focus groups, and journal prompts. Analysis followed Moustakas’ (1994) four-step process: epoché, phenomenological reduction, imaginative variation, and synthesis of composite textural and structural descriptions. Seven themes emerged. The first four, Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity vs. Dehumanization, addressed faculty perceptions of AI. The remaining three, Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences, highlighted how perceptions influenced job satisfaction. Findings suggest that most faculty perceived AI as a positive influence on job satisfaction, but there is a need for institutional guidelines and support for ethical AI integration. This study highlighted the affective and ethical dimensions of AI in Christian higher education. Findings indicate a need for balance between human connection and technological aspects of AI. Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame. Future research includes exploring institutional readiness, communication strategies, and comparisons between faith-based and secular institutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 44 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Faculty tend to accept and adopt technology if the institution they work at supports the technology and trains them on it.
“Faculty tend to accept and adopt technology if the institution they work at supports the technology and trains them on it (Dangi & Saat, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dangi & Saat, 2021 source
In “Indirect Effects on ACPU, ACPEU, and ACAU” (page unavailable), the paper identifies training as a form of institutional support and reports that higher support can increase accounting educators’ intention to adopt educational technology. The claim extends that finding to faculty generally and to actual acceptance and adoption, whereas the study reports intentions; it also notes that support does not significantly increase intention when educators consider a technology impractical. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Teacher satisfaction in Christian education is more connected to faith integration and self-efficacy than to other factors.
“However, teacher satisfaction in Christian education is more connected to faith integration (Syptak et al., 2016) and self-efficacy (Sum & Oancea, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Syptak et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sum & Oancea, 2022 source
The Sum and Oancea citation is attached to the self-efficacy part of the sentence. The Findings discuss teachers’ confidence in emergency remote teaching and their satisfaction with aspects of that experience, but do not link self-efficacy to teacher satisfaction in Christian education or compare it with other factors. Searches for self-efficacy, satisfaction, and Christian education found no passage addressing that relationship; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The experience of mixed emotional responses and ethical navigation among Christian faculty was supported by literature.
“The experience of mixed emotional responses and ethnical navigation was supported by literature (Hagendorff, 2020;Mamo et al., 2024;Mittelstadt, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Hagendorff, 2020 source
Section 4.2 (page unavailable) discusses situation-specific ethical deliberation by technology developers, which supports the ethical-navigation aspect in a general AI context. It does not report mixed emotional responses or examine Christian faculty, so it cannot substantiate those parts of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mamo et al., 2024 source
- cites Mittelstadt, 2019 source
Section 2.2, “Professional history and norms” (page unavailable), discusses AI developers navigating conflicting ethical concepts and moral dilemmas. It does not address mixed emotional responses or the experiences of Christian faculty, so it supports only the general ethical-navigation aspect of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The use of AI as a filter is balanced by expert prompting and final oversight of the human faculty.
“However, this is balanced by expert prompting and final oversight of the human faculty (Chounta et al., 2022;Crockle et al., 2022;Ofosu-Ampong, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Chounta et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Crockle et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ofosu-Ampong, 2024 source
The Discussion (section 5.4) calls for considering the human element in AI adoption, and the measurement items say AI should complement the instructor’s role. Neither passage addresses expert prompting or final faculty oversight. Searches for those terms and for AI as a filter found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
A consistent subtheme was concern about AI as something to have a healthy respect for as a potential danger, threat, or something to fear or avoid.
“There was also a consistent subtheme in expressing a concern of AI as something to have a healthy respect for as a potential danger, threat, or something to fear or avoid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Participants expressed a desire to learn about AI use.
“In their description of proficiency, participants expressed a desire to learn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Faculty described complex emotional responses to AI use, including confusion, frustration, uncertainty, surprise, happiness, and excitement.
“The use of AI among faculty includes the description of complex emotional responses in their description of their lived experiences: confusion, frustration, uncertainty, surprise, happiness, and excitement.”
- Also stated in: § Emotional Response. · plain
“The breadth of emotional responses in the lived experiences of participants was varied and complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Emotional Response. · plain
- Findingown data
Most faculty perceived AI as a positive influence on job satisfaction.
“Findings suggest that most faculty perceived AI as a positive influence on job satisfaction, but there is a need for institutional guidelines and support for ethical AI integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The extent to which participants used AI as a tool varied.
“The extent to which this tool was used varied among participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AI was also used to generate review questions or ideas.
“The tool was also used to generate review questions or ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Another use of AI as a tool was incorporating it into student assignments to increase engagement.
“Another use of AI as a tool included the incorporation of this technology into student assignments to increase engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some participants described using AI to increase productivity with support tasks such as letters of recommendation and email responses.
“Some participants described the use of AI to increase their productivity with support tasks, such as letters of recommendation and email responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most participants reported a subtheme of the danger and reality of AI being used for unethical purposes by students or faculty.
“A final subtheme reported by most participants was the danger and reality of AI being used for unethical purposes by students or faculty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Internal conflicts about AI use was a subtheme related to navigating ethical dilemmas, expressed by many participants.
“Internal conflicts in the use of AI was a subtheme related to navigating ethical dilemma expressed by many participants during their interviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The challenge of navigating ethical dilemmas was a strong theme among all participants.
“The challenge of navigating ethical dilemmas was a strong theme among all participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
An overarching finding was the time-saving ability of AI use within higher education.
“An overarching finding included the time-saving ability of AI use within higher education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Incorporation of AI technology allows participants to improve communication and streamline support tasks, such as crafting email responses and recommendation letters.
“Incorporation of AI technology allows participants to improve communication and streamline support tasks, such as crafting email responses and recommendation letters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Faculty described incorporating AI into student assignments to show students how AI can be used as a tool in their discipline.
“Faculty also described incorporating AI into student assignments to show students how AI can be used as a tool in their discipline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
AI was used within assignments to teach students how to generate ideas within their discipline.
“It was used within assignments to teach students how to generate ideas within their discipline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants lamented the lack of authoritative guidelines or policies from both their department and upper administration.
“Participants lamented the lack of authoritative guidelines or policies from both their department and upper administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
AI has the potential to make participant tasks more efficient.
“AI has the potential to make participant tasks more efficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants felt some level of hypocrisy when students violated instructions not to use AI for assignment completion and received an honor code violation while the participants themselves were using AI.
“Participants felt some level of hypocrisy when students violated instructions not to use AI for assignment completion and received an honor code violation when the participants were using AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When asked about job satisfaction in relation to AI use, the majority of participants said their job satisfaction related to interaction with students, not AI.
“When asked about job satisfaction in relation to the use of AI, the majority voiced that their job satisfaction is in relation to the interaction with the students, not AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants noted AI's ability to change the emotive style of language as a benefit when crafting email responses.
“Participants noted AI's ability to change the emotive style of language to be a benefit when crafting email responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
As technology evolves quickly, shifting boundaries of appropriate use have left some faculty frustrated.
“As technology is quickly evolving, the shifting boundaries of appropriate use have left some faculty frustrated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants placed strong emphasis on the importance of authentic feedback.
“Participants placed a strong emphasis on the importance of authentic feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some participants felt angry when students chose to use AI inappropriately.
“Some of them felt angry when students chose to use AI inappropriately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants perceived learning in a shared space through practical and often physical interactions as a distinct quality that enhances the value of human instruction.
“Being able to experience learning in a shared space through practical and often physical interactions is perceived as a distinct quality and enhances the value of human instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants valued human factors in personal interaction.
“They value the human factors in personal interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overarching concern was making ethical decisions when instructing students not to use AI in each class while the participant was using AI to facilitate the same class.
“The overarching concern was making ethical decisions when instructing students not to use AI in each class when the participant was using AI to facilitate the same class.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants felt their lived experiences allowed them to relate in specific and personal ways that generated AI responses did not provide.
“The lived experiences of the participants allow them to relate in specific and personal ways that they felt was not provided by generated AI responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
AI was used within assignments to model to students the appropriate use of the tool.
“AI was used within assignments to model to students the appropriate use of the tool.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The use of AI as a tool and the desire for increased policy guidance strongly overlapped with the ethical dilemma theme.
“The use of AI as a tool and the desire for increased policy guidance also strongly overlapped with this theme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AI was described as a tool that increased participants' productivity.
“AI was described as a tool that increased the productivity of participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some faculty were uncomfortable with the lack of human authenticity in AI output.
“However, some faculty are uncomfortable with the lack of human authenticity of the output.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Student engagement through AI was an important finding.
“Student engagement through AI was also an important finding from the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many participants described using AI to generate data and create ideas.
“Many of the study participants described their use of AI to generate data and create ideas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Participants who reported more positive experiences, more encouragement from peers, and improved proficiency also reported faster adoption of AI.
“participants who reported more positive experiences, more encouragement from peers, and improved proficiency also reported faster adoption of AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participants expressed discomfort with overreliance on AI where faculty value unique authentic human contributions.
“The participants expressed discomfort with over reliance on AI where the faculty value unique authentic human contributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of all six individuals interviewed, Adam was the only one who expressed a clear negative thought about AI and job satisfaction.
“Of all the six individuals interviewed, he was the only one who expressed a clear negative thought about AI and job satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When Claire identified AI as a great opportunity to learn and grow and to give students meaningful assignments, she expressed a desire for individual growth and community.
“When Claire identified AI as a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Faculty expressed varying levels of experience with AI usage.
“Faculty expressed varying levels of experience with AI usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Faculty readiness to adopt AI is not uniform but is influenced by mental, cognitive, and resource factors that shape whether AI is experienced as a threat or an opportunity.
“Together, these perspectives suggest that faculty readiness to adopt AI is not uniform but is influenced by mental, cognitive, and resource factors that shape whether AI is experienced as a threat or an opportunity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI provides a means for teachers to reach an increased level of job satisfaction.
“Keeping in mind the definitions of motivation and satisfaction presented by Bhatt et al. (2022), AI provides a means for teachers to reach an increased level of job satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Failure to articulate and disseminate guidance adds to the lack of clear direction.
“This failure to articulate and disseminate guidance adds to the lack of clear direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Faculty, as humans, are subject to emotional bias.
“Faculty, as humans, are subject to emotional bias (Hagendroff, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hagendroff, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
An unintended emotional tonality can creep into communication with students.
“An unintended emotional tonality can creep into the communication with the students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Without support, faculty must rely on their own ethics and intuition to establish where to draw the line.
“Without support, faculty must rely on their own ethics and intuition to establish for themselves where to draw the line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Emotional bias may be more prevalent when grading, critiquing, and providing feedback to students.
“This may be more prevalent when grading, critiquing, and providing feedback to students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The relationship between positive experiences, peer encouragement, improved proficiency and faster AI adoption is related to performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions.
“These are related to performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions (Bawaneh et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bawaneh et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Uncertainty about AI boundaries affects participants' engagement and instruction with students.
“This uncertainty then bleeds into the participants' engagement and instruction with students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Using AI as a filter, faculty can neutralize unintentional emotive language to provide less reactive feedback.
“Using AI as a filter, the faculty can neutralize unintentional emotive language to provide less reactive feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Perceived behavioral control is a new explanation not previously discussed in the literature for Christian educators' experience with AI.
“one new explanation not previously discussed in the literature for Christian educators is the construct of perceived behavioral control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
AI use has a greater benefit than just its functional implementation.
“This demonstrates that AI use has a greater benefit than just its functional implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A limitation of the study is the small sample size: a homogeneous group from a single faith-based institution.
“A further limitation is the small sample size: A homogeneous group from a single faith-based institution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 67
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThose who have a higher theoretical and practical understanding of AI are more ready to use it and have a more positive attitude toward it.
“Those who have a higher theoretical and practical understanding of AI are more ready to use it and have a more positive attitude toward it (Jöhnk, et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Jöhnk, et al., 2021 source
The Knowledge discussion (section 4.3; page unavailable in our copy) says AI awareness helps employees understand AI’s applications and form adequate expectations. The change-management discussion says explaining AI’s benefits can increase employee acceptance. But the paper addresses organizational readiness; it does not establish that people with greater theoretical and practical understanding are individually more ready to use AI or have more positive attitudes than others. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThose who are not as ready to use AI have a hard time trusting the tool and fear that AI will cause them to lose their jobs.
“Those who are not as ready note that they have a hard time trusting the tool and fear that AI will cause them to lose their jobs (Chounta et al., 2022;Ofosu-Ampong, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Chounta et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ofosu-Ampong, 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationMember checking, triangulation, and bracketing were additional strategies used to ensure trustworthiness.
“Additional strategies to ensure trustworthiness included member checking, triangulation, and bracketing (Yadav, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yadav, 2022 source
Table 6 (Declarations; page unavailable) lists triangulation and respondent validation—presenting tentative analyses to respondents for feedback—as strategies to enrich trustworthiness. It also lists reflexivity about researcher preconceptions and biases, but does not identify bracketing as a strategy, so that part of the cited list is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPerceived behavioral control is a construct of the Theory of Planned Behavior and has been found to be statistically significant in the intention to use AI among program designers and higher educators.
“Perceived behavioral control is a construct of the Theory of Planned Behavior and has been found to be statistically significant in the intention to use AI among program designers and higher educators (Ivanov et al., 2024;Jiao & Cao, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Ivanov et al., 2024 source
- cites Jiao & Cao, 2024 source
The TPB literature-review section identifies perceived behavioral control as a TPB construct. The Findings (Structural model; page unavailable) report a significant positive association with intention to use AI-aided design (b = 0.556, p < 0.001). However, the Methods (Participants; page unavailable) describe art-and-design students and design practitioners, not specifically program designers or higher educators; this paper does not support those population labels. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first four themes addressed faculty perceptions of AI, and the remaining three themes highlighted how those perceptions influenced job satisfaction.
“The first four, Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity vs. Dehumanization, addressed faculty perceptions of AI.The remaining three, Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences, highlighted how perceptions influenced job satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFour themes answered research question one, with three of those themes having subthemes, and three themes answered research question two.
“Four themes were generated answering research question one with three of the themes having subthemes and three themes were generated answering research question two.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSeven themes emerged from the analysis of the data.
“Seven themes emerged.”
- Also stated in: § Findings · plain
“There were seven total themes generated from a list of 95 total codes to answer the two research questions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Findings · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA codebook was created with a total of 95 unique codes and associated quotes.
“A codebook was created with a total of 95 unique codes and associated quotes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants' lived experiences with AI use yielded three subthemes: growth in AI proficiency, emotional responses to AI, and viewing AI as an antagonist.
“Three specific subthemes came out of their lived experiences related to (1) growth in proficiency in the use of AI, (2) emotional responses in the use of AI, and (3) viewing AI as an antagonist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll six participants described struggling with determining clear ethical boundaries for AI use in their work roles and navigating internal conflicts about AI use.
“All six participants described struggling with determining clear ethical boundaries for use of AI in their work roles, as well as navigating internal conflicts in the use of AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll participants described utilizing AI to assist with job responsibilities, and use of AI as a tool was a notable finding.
“A notable finding that emerged from the data included the use of AI as a tool.All participants in the study described utilizing AI to assist with job responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants were working through the challenge of using AI themselves while informing and reminding students that they could not use AI in their courses.
“Participants are working through the challenges of using AI themselves while informing and reminding students they could not use AI in their courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataParticipants' responses about expectations related to AI use and job satisfaction ranged widely.
“There was a wide range of responses from the participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough institutional leadership has provided guidance, it is difficult to implement at the faculty level.
“Though institutional leadership has provided guidance, it is difficult to implement at the faculty level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome faculty emphasized the importance of human authenticity to the teaching process and felt that overuse of AI in the classroom dehumanized the experience for faculty and students.
“Some faculty emphasized the importance of the human authenticity to the teaching process and felt that the overuse of AI in the classroom dehumanized the experience for the faculty and student.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCollectively, participants expressed distinct limitations of AI and the importance of human expertise, embodied teaching practices, and empathy from lived experience.
“Collectively, the participants expressed the distinct limitations of AI and the importance of human expertise, embodied teaching practices, and empathy from lived experience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFaculty valued human authenticity when generating course content and considered a need to limit how AI-generated content is integrated into a course.
“Faculty expressed the value of human authenticity when generating course content, though the need to limit how AIgenerated content is integrated into a course was considered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAI goes beyond task support by allowing participants to generate assignments and further engage students.
“However, AI goes beyond task support by allowing participants to generate assignments and further engage students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants found AI's lack of lived experience to contextualize responses problematic, even though AI can generate empathetic statements.
“While AI can generate empathetic statements, participants found the lack of lived experience to contextualize the response to be problematic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThere is an underlying emphasis on the importance of the distinct human contribution as a faculty member.
“However, there is an underlying emphasis on the importance of the distinct human contribution as a faculty member.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPaul, as a faculty mentor, is working to bridge the gap between AI and faculty.
“Paul, as a faculty mentor, is working to bridge the gap between AI and faculty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSubthemes focused specifically on internal conflicts, setting appropriate ethical boundaries, and unethical uses of AI.
“Subthemes focused specifically on internal conflicts, setting appropriate ethical boundaries, and unethical uses of AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenMuch of the disapproval of AI comes from the inability of AI to provide hands-on training.
“Much of the disapproval comes from the inability of AI to provide hands-on training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAll participants were Christians teaching in a Christian institution.
“All the participants are Christians teaching in a Christian institution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEach of the core themes was linked back to previous literature.
“each of the themes were also linked back to previous literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPaul emphasized the importance of AI users coming together to pioneer boundaries and best practices.
“Additionally, Paul emphasized the importance of coming together, as AI users, to work together to pioneer those boundaries and best practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhile the dehumanizing quality of AI was negatively perceived, a productive application was discovered by the participant.
“It is interesting to note that, while the dehumanizing quality of AI was negatively perceived, a productive application was discovered by the participant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome participants expressed a desire to be ahead of others in AI use.
“Some expressed the desire to be ahead of others in the use of AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAI was used for the creation of case studies, review questions, games, and test bank creation.
“AI was also used for the creation of case studies, review questions, games, and test bank creation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants reported that students can misinterpret the attitude or tone of their email communication and that AI is particularly useful for revising to address these issues.
“They reported that students can misinterpret the attitude or tone of their email communication, and that AI is particularly useful for revising to address these issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough participants acknowledged a need to instruct students in AI technology, logistical, ethical, and practical boundaries still need to be established or clarified.
“While there is an acknowledgement that there is a need to instruct students in this developing technology, there are still logistical, ethical, and practical boundaries that need to be established or clarified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants had varying experiences with AI use, and several expressed concerns over that use.
“The participants had varying experiences with AI use and several expressed concerns over that use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSeveral faculty members reported that job expectations in a Christian institution are higher.
“Several faculty members reported that job expectations in a Christian institution are higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningParticipants taught different disciplines and thus had varied experiences.
“However, they teach different disciplines and thus have varied experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile some boundaries such as plagiarism, academic misconduct, and Turnitin rules are clearer, some faculty wrestle with what AI tools or processes are appropriate to teach students.
“While some boundaries are clearer, such as rules regarding plagiarism, academic misconduct, and the use of Turnitin, some faculty wrestle with what, if any, AI tools or processes are appropriate to teach students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTo model behavior for future teachers, faculty modeled their behavior and guided students.
“To model the behavior for future teachers, the faculty modeled their behavior and guided them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataDue to the lack of well-established norms for AI, Paul relied on self-training to learn about AI.
“Due to the lack of well-established norms when dealing with AI, Paul had to rely on self-training to learn about AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataWhen AI is efficient in saving time to complete tasks, using AI preserves time for better and more effective interaction.
“However, when AI is efficient in saving time to complete their tasks, using AI preserves time for better and effective interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThere are disparate views regarding what is and is not appropriate AI usage.
“There are disparate views regarding what is and is not appropriate AI usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEach of the core themes was supported throughout the data.
“each of the core themes were supported throughout the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough technology can be leveraged effectively in various ways, AI has limitations as requests become more specialized.
“While technology can be leveraged effectively in a variety of ways, there are limitations as the requests of AI become more specialized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe first four themes-Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity versus Dehumanization-spoke to the initial research question focused on faculty experience utilizing AI in teaching.
“The first four themes, Journey from Fear and Resistance to Cautious Integration, Navigating the Ethical Dilemma, Utilizing AI as a Tool, and Human Authenticity versus Dehumanization, spoke to the initial research question which focused on faculty experience utilizing AI in teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe participants provided rich, detailed narratives about their perceptions, thoughts, and feelings regarding their utilization of AI and how that utilization influenced their job satisfaction.
“The participants provided rich, detailed narratives about their perceptions, thoughts, and feelings regarding their utilization of AI”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe participants in the study expressed negative or positive job satisfaction concerning AI usage.
“The participants in the study expressed negative or positive job satisfaction concerning AI usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThis study explored and presented the lived experiences of a sample of six Christian higher education faculty members.
“This study explored and presented the lived experiences of a sample of six Christian higher education faculty members.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe second research question focused on how these perceptions affected their job satisfaction and includes themes of Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences with AI on Job Satisfaction.
“The second research question focused on how these perceptions affected their job satisfaction and includes themes of Lack of Institutional Compass, Christian Lens and Job Expectations, and Disparate Experiences with AI on Job Satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSome faculty raised questions about whether AI is applicable to all disciplines.
“While the faculty expressed concerns and delight for the use of AI through their statements, some raised questions about whether it is applicable to all disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFindings from this study aligned with Schreiner's three dimensions for job expectations through a Christian lens.
“Findings from this study aligned with these dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenPaul expressed a similar attitude when he said Christian institutions must be pioneers or leaders in the use of AI.
“Paul expressed a similar attitude when he said Christian institutions must be pioneers or leaders in the use of AI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe data collection process revealed 95 unique codes which were condensed into seven overarching themes representing these lived experiences.
“The data collection process revealed 95 unique codes which were condensed into seven overarching themes representing these lived experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationBracketing was performed prior to interviews to minimize researcher bias.
“Bracketing was performed prior to interviews to minimize researcher bias (Moustakas, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moustakas, 1994 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTeacher satisfaction with AI is predicated on multiple factors, including teacher attitudes toward AI, confidence in using AI, ability to automate administrative tasks, training in AI use, and supportive leadership and a collaborative school culture.
“Teacher satisfaction with AI is predicated on multiple factors.These include teacher attitudes toward the use of AI, teacher confidence in using AI, the ability to automate administrative tasks, training in the use of AI, and supportive leadership and a collaborative school culture (Bawaneh et al., 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bawaneh et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHow to effectively implement AI in higher education institutions is not clear.
“However, how to effectively implement AI in higher education institutions (HEI) is not clear (Ofusu-Ampong, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ofusu-Ampong, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe transcripts were cleaned, read, and reread independently by all seven researchers, and the team developed meaning units (codes).
“The transcripts were cleaned, read, and reread independently by all seven researchers and the team developed meaning units (codes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEach theme and subtheme is supported by participant quotes.
“Each of the themes and subthemes are supported by participant quotes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study had a short time frame.
“Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEach code was validated with quotes.
“Each code was then validated with quotes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThree data collection methods-semi-structured interviews, Canvas discussion board focus groups, and Canvas journal entries-ensured triangulation and enhanced the trustworthiness of the findings.
“Three data collection methods, which were semi-structured interviews, canvas discussion board focus groups, and Canvas journal entries, ensured triangulation and enhanced the trustworthiness of the findings (Creswell & Poth, 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Creswell & Poth, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.
“The study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationA transcendental phenomenological approach was appropriate for capturing and describing participants' lived experiences.
“This approach was appropriate as it emphasizes understanding participants' experiences from their own perspectives, aligning with the study's aim to capture and describe these lived experiences (Moustakas, 1994).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moustakas, 1994 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSocial desirability was a limitation of the study.
“Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study had a small sample size.
“Limitations include a small sample size, social desirability, and a short time frame.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo ensure confidentiality, pseudonyms were assigned and all data were stored in a password-protected Canvas shell accessible only to the research team.
“To ensure confidentiality, pseudonyms were assigned, and all data were stored in a password-protected Canvas shell accessible only to the research team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInformed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.
“Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll seven researchers met, debated, and formulated the final themes.
“All seven researchers met, debated, and formulated the final themes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationAn audit trail was maintained throughout the research process to ensure trustworthiness and confirmability.
“To ensure trustworthiness and confirmability, an audit trail was maintained throughout the research process (Hayashi et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hayashi et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLack of authoritative institutional boundaries results in confusion about what generated content is appropriate and leads to fear and discomfort as participants navigate evolving technology.
“This lack of authoritative institutional boundaries not only results in confusion regarding what kind of generated content is appropriate but leads to fear and discomfort as participants work to navigate this evolving technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWhen used appropriately, AI can improve the productivity of faculty in higher education and allow for faculty to teach more effectively through active learning and engaging activities.
“When used appropriately, AI can improve the productivity of faculty in higher education and allow for faculty to teach more effectively through active learning and engaging activities (Bawaneh et al., 2025;Moore & Lookadoo, 2024;Nararetsky et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bawaneh et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Moore & Lookadoo, 2024 source
- cites Nararetsky et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe novelty and evolution of AI technology put pressure on faculty to become experts and participate in pioneering standards.
“However, the novelty and evolution of the technology put pressure on the faculty to become experts and participate in the pioneering of these standards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWritten communication may lack the vocal affectations and body language needed to fully express the intent of the faculty's feedback.
“Written communication may lack the vocal affectations and body language needed to fully express the intent of the faculty's feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNavigating how to mentor and lead students through appropriate AI use is challenging for Christian educators who reportedly hold themselves to high ethical standards when there are not always clear and specific rules and much of AI use is subjective.
“Navigating how to mentor and lead students through appropriate use is challenging, as Christian educators who reportedly hold themselves to high ethical standards when there are not always clear and specific rules, and much of AI use is subjective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningOne would expect several Christian universities will also take bold steps to develop a Christian framework to foster AI use for kingdom advancement.
“As the University of South Florida had the vision”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kam & Kim, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nam, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Young-Ju Ham, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThrough his statement, Paul indicated that faculty in Christian higher education must be willing to adopt innovations sooner rather than later.
“Through his statement, he indicated that faculty in Christian higher education must be willing to adopt innovations sooner rather than later.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSulkowski et al. challenged Christian universities to integrate AI and similar technologies to enhance student learning experiences for future opportunities and development.
“Sulkowski et al. (2024) challenged Christian universities to integrate AI and similar technologies to enhance student learning experiences for future opportunities and development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sulkowski et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenSelf-report may force participants to make socially acceptable statements.
“Additionally, self-report may force participants to make socially acceptable statements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLang described the responsibility of Christian institutions to lead the way on ethical AI adoption and even establish AI institutes so that innovations can be made for the greater good.
“Lang (2023a) described the responsibility of Christian institutions to lead the way on ethical AI adoption and even establish AI institutes, as demonstrated by the University of South Florida, so that innovations can be made for the greater good (2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lang, 2023a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWhile desiring to support their faculty, the rapid evolution of AI technology and its diverse applications make crafting a one-size-fits-all solution difficult.
“While desiring to support their faculty, the rapid evolution of this technology and its diverse applications make crafting a one-size-fits-all solution difficult (Yarovenko et al., 2024;Jun-Seop & Ham, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yarovenko et al., 2024 source
- cites Jun-Seop & Ham, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe role of faculty and the type of tool available may impact their job satisfaction.
“The role of faculty and the type of tool available may impact their job satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe interviews were completed back-to-back.
“The interviews were completed back-toback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe faith integration of AI into educational curricula would ensure the spiritual and ethical objectives of Christian learning are not compromised but rather serve as a tool to fulfill God's purpose in education.
“The faith integration of Artificial intelligence (AI) into educational curricula would ensure the spiritual and ethical objectives of Christian learning are not compromised but rather serve as a tool to fulfill God's purpose in education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe novelty and rapid evolution of AI provide an opportunity for faculty who use this technology to set the standard rather than have it imposed upon them.
“However, this does provide an opportunity for faculty who use this technology to set the standard rather than have it imposed upon them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRole modeling by faculty can result in personal fulfillment and affect meaningful change in the community.
“Role modeling by faculty can result in personal fulfillment and affect meaningful change in the community (Lee et al., 2024;Schreiner, 2018Schreiner, , 2022)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKim and Lee et al. warned that institutions must establish guidelines for proper AI use, especially in Christian settings.
“Kim (2020) and Lee et al. (2024) warned that institutions must establish guidelines for proper AI use, especially in Christian settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationChristian universities can take the lead from the University of South Florida to the next level where faculty and students learn and practice ethical use of AI in their day-to-day lives.
“While several universities are following the lead from the University of South Florida, Christian universities can take it to the next level where faculty and students learn and practice ethical use of AI in their day-to-day lives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe research questions and the purpose were predetermined for the group because the study was facilitated by an organized faculty training event.
“The research questions and the purpose were predetermined for the group since this was facilitated by an organized faculty training event.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWhile recurring themes were noted, the data were not quantified.
“While recurring themes were noted, the data were not quantified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSchreiner identified three dimensions for job expectations through a Christian lens: individual growth, communal benefit, and Kingdom advancement.
“Schreiner (2018Schreiner ( , 2022) ) identified three dimensions for job expectations through a Christian lens: individual growth, communal benefit, and Kingdom advancement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationNew faculty must be oriented to multifaceted professional development, including the use of AI and related organizational policies, so that they will adopt appropriate AI functions.
“New faculty must be oriented to the multifaceted professional development, including the use of AI and related organizational policies so that they will adopt the appropriate AI functions as they continue their journey as faculty (Cockle et al., 2022;Sulkowski et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cockle et al., 2022 source
- cites Sulkowski et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThrough faculty experimentation and collaboration, faculty may be best suited to establish the boundaries and best practices to ensure optimal learning experiences for students.
“While this may result in a period of uncertainty, through faculty experimentation and collaboration, they may be best suited to establish the boundaries and best practices to ensure optimal learning experiences for students (Kam & Kim, 2024;Nam. 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kam & Kim, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nam. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataImplications of this research speak to the importance of the varied and diverse lived experiences of Christian higher education faculty and staff in utilizing AI, and how this might translate into desired training, guidance, policies and organizational structures for the future.
“to the importance of the varied and diverse lived experiences of Christian higher education faculty and staff in utilizing AI, and how this might translate into desired training, guidance, policies and organizational structures for the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile this study was limited in scope, its implications require the need for Christian educators to align with the changing dynamics of the digital era, while remaining rooted in biblical principles and its foundational mission.
“While this study was limited in scope, its implications require the need for Christian educators to align with the changing dynamics of the digital era, while remaining rooted in biblical principles and its foundational mission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe novelty and rapid evolution of AI have left university leadership in a difficult position.
“This has left university leadership in a difficult position.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: AI is having a sweeping impact on nearly every field and thereby affecting the vast majority of faculty.
- Rests on an assumption: AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
The paper relies on this without support.
Understanding how AI is experienced and adopted by Christian higher education faculty and its impact on their job satisfaction remains unknown.
“However, understanding the trajectory of how AI is experienced and adopted by Christian higher education faculty and its impact on their job satisfaction remains to be known.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a critical gap in the literature: the absence of the voice of Christian faculty.
“A critical gap in the literature is the absence of the voice of Christian facultythose who approach this journey not only as educators but as spiritual leaders.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Christian faculty approach AI as spiritual leaders and bring a distinctive lens where discernment, purpose, and calling intersect with digital innovation.
“Their perspective brings a distinctive lens, where discernment, purpose, and calling intersect with digital innovation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Christian faith or working in a Christian institution is a meaningful factor shaping faculty perceptions of AI and job satisfaction.
“All the participants are Christians teaching in a Christian institution.However, they teach different disciplines and thus have varied experiences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI is having a sweeping impact on nearly every field and thereby affecting the vast majority of faculty.
“Unlike many technologies that are developed for specific industries and become democratized over time, AI is having a sweeping impact on nearly every field and thereby affecting the vast majority of faculty.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI technology is novel and persistently evolving, placing a burden on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.
“Because of the novelty of this technology and the persistent evolution of the tools, a burden has been placed on faculty to become experts in this expanding technology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.
“Faculty examine everything through the Christian lens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The significance of the topic of AI in higher education relates directly to the pervasiveness of AI and to its expanding impact on higher education.
“The significance of this topic relates directly to the pervasiveness of AI and to its expanding impact on higher education.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The named analysis step changes between sections
MinorThe abstract identifies phenomenological reduction as the second analysis step, while the Data Analysis section calls it education.
“Analysis followed Moustakas' (1994) four-step process: epoché, phenomenological reduction, imaginative variation, and synthesis of composite textural and structural descriptions.”
“Data were analyzed using Moustakas' four steps phenomenological processes: epoché, education, imaginative variation, and synthesis of composite textural and composite structural descriptions”
Syptak citation year differs from its reference
MinorThe text cites Syptak and colleagues as a 2016 source, whereas the matching reference is dated 1996.
“teacher satisfaction in Christian education is more connected to faith integration (Syptak et al., 2016)”
“Syptak, J.M., & Marsland, D., & Ulmer, D. (1996). Job satisfaction: Putting theory into practice.”
Karaca study has conflicting publication years
MinorThe introduction dates the cited tool-development study to 2022, but the reference list dates it to 2021.
“Karaca et al. (2022) developed a tool to measure technology readiness.”
“Karaca, O., Çalışkan, S. A., & Demir, K. (2021). Medical Artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS)-development, validity and reliability study.”
Tufano study has conflicting publication years
MinorThe discussion of nurse educators dates the study to 2023, but its reference-list entry gives 2003.
“Research involving nurse educators conducted by Tufano et al. (2023)”
“Tufano, V. C., Summers, E. J., & Covington, B. (2003). Motivators for nurse educators to persist in their profession: A phenomenological research study.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [3]3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2025). Qualitative inquiry and research design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- [12]12. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snydermann, B. (1959). The motivation to work. Wiley.
- [17]17. Kam, S., & Kim, M. (2024). A study on the development of ai utilization guide components at a Christian university. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 77, 171-201. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2024..77.009 · DOI
- [20]20. King James Bible. (2017). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1769)
- [33]33. Nam, S. (2023). Implications for the direction of Christian education in the age of Artificial intelligence. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 74, 107-134. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2023..74.005 · DOI
- [36]36. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320.
- [41]41. Sulkowski, Ł., Kolasińska-Morawska, K., Brzozowska, M., Morawski, P., & Seliga, R. (2024). Application of e-learning platforms by higher education institutions during the COVID- 19 pandemic: the Polish perspective. Human Technology, 20(3), 446-467. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2024.20-3. · DOI
- [43]43. Syptak, J.M., & Marsland, D., & Ulmer, D. (1996). Job satisfaction: Putting theory into practice. Family Practice Management, 6(9), 26-30.
- Authors
- Manicone, H. A., B, R., FelixOtuorimuo, I. E., Graf, L. M., Joseph, R. A., Moore, E. D., & Wilson, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Liberty University (US)
- Venue
- Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning
- Publisher
- Liberty University, Inc.
- Published
- 2026-06-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 3068-7470 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7170427720
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons (Liberty University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Innovation
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in higher education, faculty satisfaction, Christian higher education, AI in teaching, ethical use of AI, human authenticity, dehumanization, institutional support for AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review