The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Case Study Research
Abstract
Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research is an excellent resource for students and researchers in the areas of organization studies, management research and organizational psychology, bringing together in one volume the range of methods available for undertaking qualitative data collection and analysis. The volume includes 30 chapters, each focusing on a specific technique. The chapters cover traditional research methods, analysis techniques, and interventions as well as the latest developments in the field. Each chapter reviews how the method has been used in organizational research, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using the method, and presents a case study example of the method in use. A list of further reading is supplied for those requiring additional information about a given method. The comprehensive and accessible nature of this collection will make it an essential and lasting handbook for researchers and students studying organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We were thereby able to adopt an interactive approach to data collection and analysis, allowing theory development grounded in empirical evidence, which was the main strength of this design.148”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [148]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,904
Desimone, L. M. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x08331140 · Cited by 4,862
A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory
Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030810882816 · Cited by 4,604
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · Cited by 3,862
What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?
Gerring, J. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404001182 · Cited by 3,391
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartley, J.
- Corresponding author
- Hartley, Jean
- ORCID
- Hartley, Jean
- Venue
- Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications Ltd
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 323-333
- OpenAlex
- W1506150625
- Cited by
- 15,461
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 239 · 2020: 319 · 2019: 376 · 2018: 624 · 2017: 720 · 2016: 902 · 2015: 1245 · 2014: 1497 · 2013: 1452 · 2012: 1300
- FWCI
- 805.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
- SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Business and Management Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Keywords
- case study research, qualitative research, organizational analysis, qualitative data collection, qualitative data analysis, organizational psychology, management research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review