Cited by 124Pragmatism in Philosophy and EducationQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsLogic and Philosophy of Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Research as Pragmatic Problem-solving: The Pragmatist Roots of Empirically-grounded Theorizing

Strübing, Jörg·2007·The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781848607941.n27

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Metadata

Authors
Strübing, J.
Corresponding author
Strübing, Jörg
Venue
The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Published
2007
Pages
580-601
OpenAlex
W2480393182
Cited by
124
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
34.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
Keywords
pragmatism, theory development, empirical research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review