Cited by 29Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchInflammatory Bowel DiseaseGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Bioelectrical stimulation for the reduction of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease

Open access
Marshall, Ryan, Taylor, Ian, Lahr, Christopher, Abell, Thomas L., Espinoza, Ingrid, Gupta, Nitin K., Gomez, Christian R.·2015·Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

Abstract

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are the primary inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) affecting the gastrointestinal tract. The current therapy aims at decreasing inflammation and reducing symptoms. This typically requires immune suppression by steroids, thiopurines, methotrexate, or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Patients may be unreceptive to medical therapy, and some may discontinue the treatment due to adverse effects. Noninvasive, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is currently used as a treatment for depression and epilepsy, and it is being investigated for the treatment of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, migraines, and Alzheimer's disease. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of splenic and vagus nerve functions in the inflammatory process through the production of certain cytokines. We hypothesize that using transcutaneous VNS via the auricular afferent branch could achieve a selective anti-inflammatory effect on the intestinal wall. This review examines the possibility of using vagal stimulators as a therapy for IBD. This could open the door to novel treatments for numerous vagally mediated diseases characterized by poor responses to current therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4137/cgast.s31779

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, R., Taylor, I., Lahr, C., Abell, T. L., Espinoza, I., Gupta, N. K., & Gomez, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
  • Cancer Institute, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Corresponding author
Marshall, Ryan
Venue
Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
Published
2015-01
Volume
8
Pages
CGast.S31779
ISSN
  • 1178-119X (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-5522
OpenAlex
W2184946531
Cited by
29
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Medicine Insights Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
bioelectric stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, anti-inflammatory therapy, splenic nerve, cytokines, non-invasive neuromodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review