Cited by 22Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Professional Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Ambulatory Glucose Profile Reporting to Supplement A1c: Rationale and Practical Implementation

Hirsch, Irl B., Verderese, Carol A.·2017·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective Recent consensus statements strongly advocate downloading and interpreting continuous glucose data for diabetes management in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Supplementing periodic glycated hemoglobin (A1C) testing with intermittent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) using a standardized report form known as the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) is an evolving standard of care. The rationale for this approach and its implementation with a recently approved novel monitoring technology are explored. Methods Search of the medical literature, professional guidelines, and real-world evidence guided this introduction of an integrative practice framework that uses AGP in conjunction with intermittent flash continuous glucose monitoring (FCGM) as a supplement to A1C testing. Results The combination of intermittent continuous glucose pattern analysis, standardized glucose metrics, and a readily interpretable data report has the potential to practically extend the recognized benefits of CGM to more patients and clarify the relationship between A1C and average glucose levels in individual cases. Conclusion Novel FCGM technologies portend greater use of continuous forms of glucose monitoring and wider adoption of AGP report analysis. Additional formal and empirical evidence is needed to more fully characterize best practice. Abbreviations A1C = glycated hemoglobin; AGP = ambulatory glucose profile; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; FCGM = flash continuous glucose monitoring; IQR = interquartile range; SMBG = self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep171962.ra

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirsch, I. B., & Verderese, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Hirsch, Irl B.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
1333-1344
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748403127
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
ambulatory glucose profile, HbA1c, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, diabetes management, average glucose, self-monitoring of blood glucose
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Health Care Costs, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review