Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame

Scanlon, T.M.·2008·Harvard University Press eBooks

DOI 10.4159/9780674043145

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/9780674043145

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A theory of blame
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2014.877340 · Cited by 632
Sacrifice One For the Good of Many?: People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents
Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., & Cusimano, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696458 · Cited by 246
From Responsibility to Reason-Giving Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Baum, K., Mantel, S., Schmidt, E., & Speith, T. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-022-00510-w · Cited by 103
The Explanatory Component of Moral Responsibility
Björnsson, G., & Persson, K. (2012) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00813.x · Cited by 81
Agency Laundering and Information Technologies
Rubel, A., Castro, C., & Pham, A. (2019) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10030-w · Cited by 90
A way forward for responsibility in the age of AI
Gogoshin, D. L. (2025) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2312455 · Cited by 9
Moral contamination: Perceptions of good (but not bad) deeds depend on the ethical history of the actor
Protzko, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025214 · Cited by 4

Authors: Scanlon, T. M.
Venue: Harvard University Press eBooks
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Published: 2008-01-01
DOI: 10.4159/9780674043145
OpenAlex: W4237918656
Cited by: 905
References: 0
FWCI: 33.60
Type: book
Language: fr
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review