Cited by 515Biblical Studies and InterpretationLiterature: history, themes, analysisClassical Antiquity Studies

Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman

Shostak, Marjorie·1981·Harvard University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4159/9780674043596

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although their husband's sexual advances were supposed to be delayed until menarche, !Kung women reported that this period was often stressful.

    “Although their husband's sexual advances were supposed to be delayed until menarche, women reported that this period was often stressful (107).”

    From Emerging Adulthood, a Pre-adult Life-History Stage (2020) · cites this paper as [107]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shostak, M.
Corresponding author
Shostak, Marjorie
Venue
Harvard University Press eBooks
Published
1981-12-31
OpenAlex
W4229558496
Cited by
515
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
31.75
Type
book
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
NISA, Çatalhöyük, Neolithic settlement, prehistoric village, hunter-gatherers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review