The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence
Abstract
Modern legislators are increasingly motivated to serve their constituents in personal ways. Representatives act like ultimate ombudsmen: they keep in close touch with their constituents and try to cultivate a relationship with them based on service and accessibility. The Personal Vote describes the behavior of representatives in the United States and Great Britain and the response of their constituents as well. It shows how congressmen and members of Parliament earn personalized support and how this attenuates their ties to national leaders and parties. The larger significance of this empirical work arises from its implications for the structure of legislative institutions and the nature of legislative action. Personalized electoral support correlates with decentralized governing institutions and special-interest policy making. Such systems tend to inconsistency and stalemate. The United States illustrates a mature case of this development, and Britain is showing the first movements in this direction with the decline of an established two-party system, the rise of a centrist third party, greater volatility in the vote, growing backbench independence and increasing backbench pressure for committees and staff. This book is essential for specialists in American national government, British politics, and comparative legislatures and comparative parties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities
Kitschelt, H. (2000) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041400003300607 · Cited by 1,439
Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945
Franklin, M. N., Eijk, C. V. D., Evans, D., Fotos, M., Hirczy de Mino, W., Marsh, M., & Wessels, B. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616884 · Cited by 1,421
Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942–2008
Caughey, D., & Sekhon, J. S. (2011) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr032 · Cited by 331
Ideology, Grandstanding, and Strategic Party Disloyalty in the British Parliament
SLAPIN, J. B., KIRKLAND, J. H., LAZZARO, J. A., LESLIE, P. A., & O’GRADY, T. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055417000375 · Cited by 84
Local News Coverage and the Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House
SCHAFFNER, B. F. (2006) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.3162/036298006x201904 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Cain, B., Ferejohn, J., & Fiorina, M.
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 1987-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4213357532
- Cited by
- 1,060
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4159/harvard.9780674493285
- The paper
- Cain, B., Ferejohn, J., & Fiorina, M. (1987). The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Harvard University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674493285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.