Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities
Abstract
Research on democratic party competition in the formal spatial tradition of Downs and the comparative-historical tradition of Lipset and Rokkan assumes that linkages of accountability and responsiveness between voters and political elites work through politicians’ programmatic appeals and policy achievements. This ignores, however, alternative voter-elite linkages through the personal charisma of political leaders and, more important, selective material incentives in networks of direct exchange (clientelism). In light of the diversity of linkage mechanisms appearing in new democracies and changing linkages in established democracies, this article explores theories of linkage choice. It first develops conceptual definitions of charismatic, clientelist, and programmatic linkages between politicians and electoral constituencies. It then asks whether politicians face a trade-off or mutual reinforcement in employing linkage mechanisms. The core section of the article details developmentalist, statist, institutional, political-economic, and cultural-ideological theories of citizen-elite linkage formation in democracies, showing that none of the theories is fully encompassing. The final section considers empirical measurement problems in comparative research on linkage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brazil displays none of the features of highly institutionalized party systems, programmatic patterns of political competition, strong linkages between social groups and political parties, and entrenched and stable partisan identities.
“Like most of Latin American (Kitschelt et al. 2010) and Eastern European (Rose and Mishler 1998) countries, Brazil displays none of the above features.”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Kitschelt 2000
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Failure of Presidential Democracy
Linz, J. (1994) · doi:10.56021/9780801846397 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization*
Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006) · Handbook of Party Politics · doi:10.4135/9781848608047.n19 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Kitschelt, H., Hawkins, K. A., Luna, J. P., Rosas, G., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750311 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Self-citationPolitical Parties and Uncertainty in Developing Democracies
Lupu, N., & Riedl, R. B. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012453445 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil
Areal, J. (2022) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2022.2117635 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
I Sell My Vote, and So What? A New Database and Evidence from Colombia
Fergusson, L., Molina, C., & Riaao, J. F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2935385 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kitschelt, H.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kitschelt, Herbert
- ORCID
- Kitschelt, Herbert
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- 845-879
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W2063757851
- Cited by
- 1,439
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 140 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 42.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- clientelism, charismatic leadership, accountability, responsiveness, new democracies, political elites, institutional theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review