Cited by 197Autophagy in Disease and TherapyAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsCellular transport and secretion

To be or not to be? Examples of incorrect identification of autophagic compartments in conventional transmission electron microscopy of mammalian cells

Open access
Eskelinen, Eeva-Liisa·2008·Autophagy

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy is one of the most sensitive methods to detect autophagic compartments in mammalian cells. The number of scientists that are experts in this technique has declined during recent years, probably because the method was developed over forty years ago and is not in fashion today. This has lead to a situation where, too many times, authors and reviewers alike are not able to interpret electron microscopy pictures correctly. In this commentary I present some common mistakes in identification of autophagic compartments in conventional transmission electron microscopy of mammalian cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/auto.5179

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Ashford TP, Porter KR. Cytoplasmic components in hepatic cell lysosomes. J Cell Biol 1962; 12:198-202.
  2. Clark SLJ. Cellular differentiation in the kidneys of newborn mice studied with the electron microscope. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1957; 3:349-62.
  3. Novikoff AB. The proximal tubule cell in experimental hydronephrosis. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1959; 6:136-8.
  4. Novikoff AB, Essner E. Cytolysosomes and mitochondrial degeneration. J Cell Biol 1962; 15:140-6.
  5. Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T, Kominami E, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast apg8p, is localized in autophago- some membranes after processing. EMBO J 2000; 19:5720-8.
  6. Kuma A, Matsui M, Mizushima N. LC3, an autophagosome marker, can be incorporated into protein aggregates independent of autophagy: Caution in the interpretation of LC3 localization. Autophagy 2007; 3:323-8.
  7. Klionsky DJ, Cuervo AM, Seglen PO. Methods for monitoring autophagy from yeast to human. Autophagy 2007; 3:181-206.
  8. Eskelinen EL. Fine structure of the autophagosome. In: Deretic V, ed. Autophagosome and Phagosome. Humana Press 2007; In press.
  9. Eskelinen EL, Illert AL, Tanaka Y, Blanz J, von Figura K, Saftig P. Role of LAMP-2 in lyso- some biogenesis and autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:3355-68.
  10. Jäger S, Bucci C, Tanida I, Ueno T, Kominami E, Saftig P, Eskelinen EL. Role for Rab7 in maturation of late autophagic vacuoles. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:4837-48.
  11. Eskelinen EL. Maturation of autophagic vacuoles in mammalian cells. Autophagy 2005; 1:1-10.
  12. Pfeifer U. Functional morphology of the lysosomal apparatus. In: Glaumann H, Ballard FJ, eds. Lysosomes: Their Role in Protein Breakdown. London: Academic Press, 1987:3-59.
  13. Fengsrud M, Roos N, Berg T, Liou W, Slot JW, Seglen PO. Ultrastructural and immuno- cyto-chemical characterization of autophagic vacuoles in isolated hepatocytes: Effects of vinblastine and asparagine on vacuole distributions. Exp Cell Res 1995; 221:504-19.
  14. Liou W, Geuze HJ, Slot JW. Improving structural integrity of cryosections for immunogold labeling. Histochem Cell Biol 1996; 106:41-58.
  15. Kovacs AL, Palfia Z, Rez G, Vellai T, Kovacs J. Sequestration revisited: Integrating tradi- tional electron microscopy, de novo assembly and new results. Autophagy 2007; 3:655-62.
  16. Dunn Jr WA. Studies on the mechanisms of autophagy: Formation of the autophagic vacu- ole. J Cell Biol 1990; 110:1923-33.
  17. Dunn Jr WA. Studies on the mechanisms of autophagy: Maturation of the autophagic vacuole. J Cell Biol 1990; 110:1935-45.
  18. Dunn Jr WA. Autophagy and related mechanisms of lysosomal-mediated protein degrada- tion. Trends Cell Biol 1994; 4:139-43.
  19. Arstila AU, Trump BF. Studies on cellular autophagocytosis: The formation of autophagic vacuoles in the liver after glucagon administration. Am J Pathol 1968; 53:687-733.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eskelinen, E.-L.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Eskelinen, Eeva-Liisa
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2008-02-16
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
257-260
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W1972517547
Cited by
197
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autophagy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
transmission electron microscopy, mammalian cells, autophagosomes
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Cell Compartmentation, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Humans, Mammals, Phagosomes, Research Design, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review