Cited by 13Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsLiver physiology and pathologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The special case of hepatocytes: Unique tissue architecture calls for a distinct mode of cell division

Open access
Slim, Christiaan L, van IJzendoorn, Sven CD, Lázaro-Diéguez, Francisco, Müsch, Anne·2014·BioArchitecture

Abstract

Columnar epithelia (e.g., kidney, intestine) and hepatocytes embody the two major organizational phenotypes of non-stratified epithelial cells. Columnar epithelia establish their apical and basal domains at opposing poles and organize in monolayered cysts and tubules, in which their apical surfaces form a single continuous lumen whereas hepatocytes establish their apical domains in the midst of their basolateral domains and organize a highly branched capillary luminal network, the bile canaliculi, in which a single hepatocyte can engage in lumen formation with multiple neighbors. To maintain their distinct tissue architectures, columnar epithelial cells bisect their luminal domains during symmetric cell divisions, while the cleavage furrow in dividing hepatocytes avoids bisecting the bile canalicular domains. We discuss recently discovered molecular mechanisms that underlie the different cell division phenotypes in columnar and hepatocytic model cell lines. The serine/threonine kinase Par1b determines both the epithelial lumen polarity and cell division phenotype via cell adhesion signaling that converges on the small GTPase RhoA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/bioa.29012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. [1]Bryant DM, Mostov KE. From cells to organs: building polarized tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:887–901. doi: 10.1038/nrm2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [2]O’Brien LE, Zegers MMP, Mostov KE. Opinion: Building epithelial architecture: insights from three-dimensional culture models. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:531–7. doi: 10.1038/nrm859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Giepmans BNG, van Ijzendoorn SCD. Epithelial cell-cell junctions and plasma membrane domains. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788:820–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Aijaz S, Balda MS, Matter K. Tight junctions: molecular architecture and function. Int Rev Cytol. 2006;248:261–98. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(06)48005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Shin K, Fogg VC, Margolis B. Tight junctions and cell polarity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:207–35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Blouin A, Bolender RP, Weibel ER. Distribution of organelles and membranes between hepatocytes and nonhepatocytes in the rat liver parenchyma. A stereological study. J Cell Biol. 1977;72:441–55. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.2.441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Si-Tayeb K, Lemaigre FP, Duncan SA. Organogenesis and development of the liver. Dev Cell. 2010;18:175–89. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Feracci H, Connolly TP, Margolis RN, Hubbard AL. The establishment of hepatocyte cell surface polarity during fetal liver development. Dev Biol. 1987;123:73–84. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90429-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [9]Hubbard AL, Wall DA, Ma A. Isolation of rat hepatocyte plasma membranes. I. Presence of the three major domains. J Cell Biol. 1983;96:217–29. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.1.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Luzzatto AC. Hepatocyte differentiation during early fetal development in the rat. Cell Tissue Res. 1981;215:133–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00236254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [11]Montesano R, Friend DS, Perrelet A, Orci L. In vivo assembly of tight junctions in fetal rat liver. J Cell Biol. 1975;67:310–9. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.2.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [12]Wood RL. An electron microscope study of developing bile canaliculi in the rat. Anat Rec. 1965;151:507–29. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091510403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [13]Pease JC, Tirnauer JS. Mitotic spindle misorientation in cancer--out of alignment and into the fire. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:1007–16. doi: 10.1242/jcs.081406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [14]Fischer E, Legue E, Doyen A, Nato F, Nicolas J-F, Torres V, Yaniv M, Pontoglio M. Defective planar cell polarity in polycystic kidney disease. Nat Genet. 2006;38:21–3. doi: 10.1038/ng1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. [16]Noatynska A, Gotta M, Meraldi P. Mitotic spindle (DIS)orientation and DISease: cause or consequence? J Cell Biol. 2012;199:1025–35. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201209015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [17]Knoblich JA. Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:849–60. doi: 10.1038/nrm3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [18]Reinsch S, Karsenti E. Orientation of spindle axis and distribution of plasma membrane proteins during cell division in polarized MDCKII cells. J Cell Biol. 1994;126:1509–26. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.6.1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [19]Bartles JR, Hubbard AL. Preservation of hepatocyte plasma membrane domains during cell division in situ in regenerating rat liver. Dev Biol. 1986;118:286–95. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90095-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [20]Stamatoglou SC, Enrich C, Manson MM, Hughes RC. Temporal changes in the expression and distribution of adhesion molecules during liver development and regeneration. J Cell Biol. 1992;116:1507–15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.6.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. [21]Decaens C, Durand M, Grosse B, Cassio D. Which in vitro models could be best used to study hepatocyte polarity? Biol Cell. 2008;100:387–98. doi: 10.1042/BC20070127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [22]Ihrke G, Neufeld EB, Meads T, Shanks MR, Cassio D, Laurent M, Schroer TA, Pagano RE, Hubbard AL. WIF-B cells: an in vitro model for studies of hepatocyte polarity. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:1761–75. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.6.1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [23]van IJzendoorn SC, Hoekstra D. (Glyco)sphingolipids are sorted in sub-apical compartments in HepG2 cells: a role for non-Golgi-related intracellular sites in the polarized distribution of (glyco)sphingolipids. J Cell Biol. 1998;142:683–96. doi: 10.1083/jcb.142.3.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [24]Lázaro-Diéguez F, Cohen D, Fernandez D, Hodgson L, van Ijzendoorn SCD, Müsch A. Par1b links lumen polarity with LGN-NuMA positioning for distinct epithelial cell division phenotypes. J Cell Biol. 2013;203:251–64. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201303013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [25]Slim CL, Lázaro-Diéguez F, Bijlard M, Toussaint MJM, de Bruin A, Du Q, Müsch A, van Ijzendoorn SCD. Par1b induces asymmetric inheritance of plasma membrane domains via LGN-dependent mitotic spindle orientation in proliferating hepatocytes. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [26]Werts AD, Roh-Johnson M, Goldstein B. Dynamic localization of C. elegans TPR-GoLoco proteins mediates mitotic spindle orientation by extrinsic signaling. Development. 2011;138:4411–22. doi: 10.1242/dev.070979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [27]Toyoshima F, Nishida E. Spindle orientation in animal cell mitosis: roles of integrin in the control of spindle axis. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213:407–11. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [28]Matsumura S, Hamasaki M, Yamamoto T, Ebisuya M, Sato M, Nishida E, Toyoshima F. ABL1 regulates spindle orientation in adherent cells and mammalian skin. Nat Commun. 2012;3:626. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [29]Bahmanyar S, Nelson WJ, Barth AIM. Role of APC and its binding partners in regulating microtubules in mitosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;656:65–74. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1145-2_6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  29. [30]den Elzen N, Buttery CV, Maddugoda MP, Ren G, Yap AS. Cadherin adhesion receptors orient the mitotic spindle during symmetric cell division in mammalian epithelia. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:3740–50. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-01-0023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [32]Fernández-Miñán A, Martín-Bermudo MD, González-Reyes A. Integrin signaling regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila to preserve the follicular-epithelium monolayer. Curr Biol. 2007;17:683–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [33]Zheng Z, Zhu H, Wan Q, Liu J, Xiao Z, Siderovski DP, Du Q. LGN regulates mitotic spindle orientation during epithelial morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2010;189:275–88. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200910021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [34]Maddox AS, Burridge K. RhoA is required for cortical retraction and rigidity during mitotic cell rounding. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:255–65. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200207130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  33. [35]Herrema H, Czajkowska D, Théard D, van der Wouden JM, Kalicharan D, Zolghadr B, Hoekstra D, van Ijzendoorn SCD. Rho kinase, myosin-II, and p42/44 MAPK control extracellular matrix-mediated apical bile canalicular lumen morphogenesis in HepG2 cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:3291–303. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-01-0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. [36]Théry M, Racine V, Pépin A, Piel M, Chen Y, Sibarita J-B, Bornens M. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:947–53. doi: 10.1038/ncb1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  35. [37]Kiyomitsu T, Cheeseman IM. Chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:311–7. doi: 10.1038/ncb2440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  36. [38]Cohen D, Rodriguez-Boulan E, Müsch A. Par-1 promotes a hepatic mode of apical protein trafficking in MDCK cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13792–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403684101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  37. [39]Cohen D, Brennwald PJ, Rodriguez-Boulan E, Müsch A. Mammalian PAR-1 determines epithelial lumen polarity by organizing the microtubule cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:717–27. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200308104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  38. [40]Cohen D, Fernandez D, Lázaro-Diéguez F, Müsch A. The serine/threonine kinase Par1b regulates epithelial lumen polarity via IRSp53-mediated cell-ECM signaling. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:525–40. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  39. [41]Böhm H, Brinkmann V, Drab M, Henske A, Kurzchalia TV. Mammalian homologues of C. elegans PAR-1 are asymmetrically localized in epithelial cells and may influence their polarity. Curr Biol. 1997;7:603–6. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00260-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slim, C. L., van IJzendoorn, S. C., Lázaro-Diéguez, F., & Müsch, A.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Müsch, Anne
Venue
BioArchitecture
Published
2014-03-11
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
47-52
ISSN
  • 1949-0992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-100X
OpenAlex
W1516020164
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioArchitecture (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01KD064842-07)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK064842, P30DK041296)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
hepatocytes, apical-basal polarity, bile canaliculi, cell division, RhoA, cell adhesion signaling, lumen formation, tissue structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Cell Line, Dogs, Epithelial Cells, Extracellular Matrix, HeLa Cells, Humans, Signal Transduction, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Hepatocytes, Hep G2 Cells, Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review