Cited by 72Probiotics and Fermented FoodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Health claims substantiation for probiotic and prebiotic products

Open access
Sanders, Mary Ellen, Heimbach, James T., Pot, Bruno, Tancredi, Daniel J., Lenoir-Wijnkoop, Irene, Lähteenmäki-Uutela, Anu, Gueimonde, Miguel, Bañares, Silvia·2011·Gut Microbes

Abstract

The topic of "Health Claims Substantiation for Probiotic and Prebiotic Products" was discussed at the 8 (th) annual International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) meeting. The topic is especially timely considering that the regulatory review process for health benefit claims on probiotic and prebiotic products in Europe has not resulted in a single claim being approved (120 negative opinions on probiotic claims and 19 negative opinions on prebiotic claims through February 2011). This situation in Europe and elsewhere has driven companies to seek clarity on a research path that would stand up to scientific scrutiny as well as satisfy regulatory demands for health claim substantiation. It can be challenging to negotiate rigid regulatory distinctions, such as between health and disease, when these states are more realistically represented by continua. One research approach focused on improved homeostasis is explored as a statistically robust approach to measuring physiological parameters in healthy populations, which are the required target for food and supplement claims. Diverse global regulatory frameworks complicate this issue, and harmonization of different approaches globally would simplify requirements for industry, decrease consumer confusion and improve the scientific framework for the research community to set up appropriate research pathways. This report highlights key points from this discussion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4161/gmic.2.3.16174

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence accumulated to-date on recovery of probiotics from feces indicates that most current probiotics do not colonize.

    “Evidence accumulated to-date on recovery of probiotics from feces indicates that most current probiotics do not colonize.75,, 76”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanders, M. E., Heimbach, J. T., Pot, B., Tancredi, D. J., Lenoir-Wijnkoop, I., Lähteenmäki-Uutela, A., Gueimonde, M., & Bañares, S.
Affiliations
  • Institut Pasteur de Lille (FR)
  • Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (ES)
  • Universitat Abat Oliba CEU (ES)
Corresponding author
Sanders, Mary Ellen
Venue
Gut Microbes
Published
2011-05-28
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
127-133
ISSN
  • 1949-0976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1949-0984
OpenAlex
W2075760053
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Gut Microbes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
health claim substantiation, probiotics, prebiotics, regulatory review, negative opinions, healthy population, regulatory harmonization, functional food claims, dietary supplements
MeSH terms
Consumer Product Safety, Europe, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Legislation, Food, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics, Prebiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review