Cited by 278Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and Health

Probiotics for human use

Open access
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D., Merrifield, C. A., Hutkins, R.·2018·Nutrition Bulletin

Abstract

Probiotics have become a popular approach for managing digestive and immune health and are being recommended more frequently as effective therapeutic interventions by medical professionals. Introduced early in the 20th century, the science of probiotics has advanced considerably, especially in the past two decades. Researchers have adopted a consensus definition, begun to understand many of the mechanisms of action, defined characteristics important to probiotic function and have obtained clinical evidence supporting probiotic health benefits and product quality. Nonetheless, a need remains for clear, evidence‐based communications to consumers on the role of probiotics in a healthy diet and to healthcare providers regarding clinical use. However, regulatory frameworks in many countries have restricted progress on this front. There is a need for additional research to further clarify the most effective probiotics for given health outcomes and to identify people most likely to respond to specific probiotic interventions. This review provides current perspective on the probiotic concept, discusses evidence‐based probiotic interventions, considers fermented foods with regard to probiotics and addresses some regulatory challenges facing the probiotic field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nbu.12334

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shared, core mechanisms for probiotic function are evident, although some mechanisms, including those related to immunomodulation, may be more narrowly distributed.

    “Shared, core mechanisms for probiotic function are evident, although some mechanisms may be more narrowly distributed, including those related to immunomodulation [121].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bartle D, Knight C, Cairns P (2016) The Use of Probiotics in Preterm Babies. In NHS. South West Neonatal Framework NHS. South West Neonatal Framework, pp. 1 -7. Available at: http:// www.swneonatalnetwork.co.uk/media/89842/swnn-guidelineprobiotics-in-preterm-babies-final-January-2016-version-02.pdf (accessed 1 April 2018).
  2. Guarner F, Sanders ME, Eliakim R et al. (2017) WGO Practice Guideline -Probiotics and Prebiotics , Vol. 2018. World Gastroenterology Organisation: Milwaukee, WI. Available at: http:// www.worldgastroenterology.org/guidelines/global-guidelines/ probiotics-and-prebiotics (accessed 1 April 2018).
  3. Szajewska H & Kolodziej M (2015) Systematic review with metaanalysis: Saccharomyces boulardii in the prevention of antibioticassociated diarrhoea. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 42 : 793 -801.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanders, M. E., Merenstein, D., Merrifield, C. A., & Hutkins, R.
Affiliations
  • International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics Centennial CO USA
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Sanders, M. E.
Venue
Nutrition Bulletin
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-10
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
212-225
ISSN
  • 1467-3010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9827
OpenAlex
W2885760831
Cited by
278
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
21.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic mechanisms of action, health benefits of probiotics, fermented foods, probiotic regulation, gut health, immune health, customer communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review