Cited by 6Neonatal Health and BiochemistryMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

Lactic dehydrogenase in umbilical cord blood in healthy infants after different modes of delivery

Open access
Wiberg-Itzel, Eva, Josephson, Hampus, Wiberg, Nana, Olson, Linus, Winbladh, Birger, Karlsson, Mathias·2015·Journal of Neonatal Biology

Abstract

Background: LDH may be a valuable marker for some of the most important diseases in newborns, and umbilical cord blood is a non-invasive and easy way to obtain blood for analysis. Aims of this study were to define interval for LDH in arterial and venous cord blood at delivery in truly healthy newborns. Method: a prospective observational study was performed at Soder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden during 2011-2012. Umbilical cord blood was collected at delivery, and value of LDH was analysed in 549 healthy infants >37 weeks of gestation, born after an uncomplicated pregnancy from a healthy mother. Results: The 2.5th and 97.5th percentile for arterial LDH was 162-612 u/L and 252-636 u/L for venous LDH. Instrumental delivery and acute caesarian section showed significantly higher intervals and elective caesarian section significantly lower than vaginal delivery. Haemolysis (>0.3 g/l) disqualified a 13-41% of the samples. Conclusion: Reported LDH levels are in accordance with earlier studies and appear to be a sensitive marker for intrapartal stress factors. The absence of an arterial/venous difference makes the sampling of cord blood easier but frequent haemolysis is a problem when using the standard method of analyses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2167-0897.1000204

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiberg-Itzel, E., Josephson, H., Wiberg, N., Olson, L., Winbladh, B., & Karlsson, M.
Affiliations
Herlev Hospital (DK)
Venue
Journal of Neonatal Biology
Published
2015
Volume
04
Issue
04
ISSN
2167-0897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603912718
Cited by
6
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Neonatal Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
lactate dehydrogenase, umbilical cord blood, healthy newborns, mode of delivery, cesarean section, vaginal delivery, reference values, hemolysis, non-invasive biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review