Cited by 24Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization

Objective measures for functional diagnostic of the upper airways: practical aspects

Open access
Chaves, C., de Andrade, C.R., Ibiapina, C.·2014·Rhinology journal

Abstract

Objective: To review the main papers published on the main available tests to obtain objective values of nasal patency and to demonstrate aspects of their use in medical practice. Methodology: We performed a non-systematic review of the MEDLINE and LILACS databases, and the most relevant articles were selected. Results: Objective evaluations are important in epidemiological studies and in monitoring of patients with nasal obstruction. There is a wide variety of objective tests of nasal function; among them acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) are currently the most used tests. Conclusion: The choice of the method to evaluate nasal function depends on the conditions of each health service. PNIF has been highlighted as a simple and reliable alternative that provides easy-to-interpret results, and is thus an attractive method for clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4193/rhino13.109

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A low PNIF quotient could correspond to an increase in bronchial resistance rather than a decrease in PNIF.

    “since a low quotient could correspond to an increase in bronchial resistance rather than a decrease in the PNIF.”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [66]

    The “Peak nasal flow” section (page not available) says lower airways can affect nasal flow measurements, supporting the general caution that a flow result may reflect more than nasal function. It does not discuss a PNIF quotient or say that a low quotient could result from increased bronchial resistance rather than decreased PNIF. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PNIF is closely related to maximum expiratory flow.

    “PNIF is closely related to maximum expiratory flow [58,63,66,67]”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [66]

    The “Peak nasal flow” section (page unavailable) says that lower airways affect PNIF values, which supports a broad connection. It does not state that PNIF is closely related to maximum expiratory flow or quantify a relationship between the two. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Noyons AKM. Hendrik Zwaardemaker: 1857- 1930. Am J Psychol. 1931; 43: 3.
  2. Cole P, Fenton RS. Contemporary rhinoma- nometry. J Otolaryngol. 2006; 35: 83.
  3. Papachristou A, Bourli E, Aivazi D, et al. Normal peak nasal inspiratory flow rate values in Greek children and adolescents Hippokratia. 2008; 12: 94-97.
  4. C h o S I , H a u s e r R , C h r i s t i a n i D C . Reproducibility of nasal peak inspiratory flow among healthy adults: assessment of epidemiologic utility. Chest. 1997; 112: 1547-1553.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaves, C., de Andrade, C. R., & Ibiapina, C.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Venue
Rhinology journal
Published
2014-06-01
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
99-103
ISSN
0300-0729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2407602587
Cited by
24
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Rhinology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Keywords
nasal patency, nasal obstruction, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow, upper airway function, functional diagnosis
MeSH terms
Airway Resistance, Humans, Inspiratory Capacity, Spirometry, Nasal Obstruction, Rhinometry, Acoustic, Rhinomanometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review